Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the spiritual health scale
- PMID: 35365035
- DOI: 10.21037/apm-22-188
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the spiritual health scale
Abstract
Background: In recent years, spiritual health became a focus of interest and nurses' spiritual health is crucial to the quality of their own lives and patients' health care. In China, high workloads, tense nurse-patient relationships, and low social status have been found to have negative impacts on the work attitude and nursing quality and spiritual health offers direction for solving this problem. This study assessed the spiritual health levels of nurses on the Chinese mainland using a revised Chinese version of the spiritual health scale (SHS-C).
Methods: A total of 747 nurses were recruited in Zhejiang Province, China. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the revised SHS-C were performed using convenience sampling, with 291 and 456 nurses used for each analysis type, respectively. Items on the SHS-C were screened using the discrete trend method, the extreme group approach, correlation analysis, and EFA to create a revised mental health questionnaire for nurses. An internal consistency test and CFA were then performed to verify the spiritual health questionnaire for nurses. A self-reporting questionnaire consisting of demographic questions and the revised SHS-C items was used for this cross-sectional correlation study.
Results: The revised SHS-C included 6 subscales comprising a total of 28 items. Cronbach's α and retest reliability for the revised questionnaire were 0.90 and 0.73, respectively. The fit of the model was analyzed by CFA [χ2/df =1.79; goodness of fit index (GFI) =0.83; adjusted GFI (AGFI) =0.79; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) =0.06; normed fit index (NFI) =0.86; comparative fit index (CFI) =0.93; non-NFI (NNFI) =0.92; incremental fit index (IFI) =0.93; parsimony NFI (PNFI) =0.76; parsimony CFI (PCFI) =0.83; and parsimony GFI (PGFI) =0.69; with each index score higher than those of the 5-subscale SHS short form previously developed by Hsiao et al.]. A reliability test showed that the overall Cronbach's α was 0.93, with a Cronbach's α of between 0.82 and 0.92 for each section. This study developed and validated a revised SHS-C.
Conclusions: Our research will help policymakers, administrators, nursing leaders, and educators to identify areas for improvement regarding nurses' spiritual health, which could translate into significant improvements in patients' health care.
Keywords: Nursing; assessment tool; spiritual health.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022. PMID: 36411694 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. Chinese, English.
-
Assessment of psychometric properties of the Persian version of the spiritual care competency self-assessment tool.Palliat Support Care. 2025 Jan 21;23:e37. doi: 10.1017/S147895152400141X. Palliat Support Care. 2025. PMID: 39834306
-
[Development of a Questionnaire Measuring Sexual Mental Health of Tibetan University Students].Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 May;47(3):382-8. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016. PMID: 27468485 Chinese.
-
Mental Health During Crisis: Development and Evaluation of the Post-disaster Spiritual Coping Scale in Turkey.J Relig Health. 2024 Apr;63(2):1609-1622. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01959-5. Epub 2023 Dec 1. J Relig Health. 2024. PMID: 38038779 Review.
-
The Flow-Clutch Scale: Translation and validation study of the Chinese version.Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2022 Nov;49:101670. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101670. Epub 2022 Sep 20. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2022. PMID: 36182711 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous