Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 1;22(1):636.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13019-w.

Parent perceived barriers and facilitators of children's adventurous play in Britain: a framework analysis

Brooke E Oliver  1 , Rachel J Nesbit  2 , Rachel McCloy  1 , Kate Harvey  1 , Helen F Dodd  3   4
Affiliations

Parent perceived barriers and facilitators of children's adventurous play in Britain: a framework analysis

Brooke E Oliver et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: From a public health perspective there is growing interest in children's play, including play involving risk and adventure, in relation to children's physical and mental health. Regarding mental health, it is theorised that adventurous play, where children experience thrilling, exciting emotions, offers important learning opportunities that prepare children for dealing with uncertainty and help prevent anxiety. Despite these benefits, adventurous play has decreased substantially within a generation. Parents have a key role in facilitating or limiting children's opportunities for adventurous play, but research identifying the barriers and facilitators parents perceive in relation to adventurous play is scarce. The present study therefore examined the barriers to and facilitators of adventurous play as perceived by parents of school-aged children in Britain.

Methods: This study analysed data from a subsample of parents in Britain (n = 377) who participated in the nationally representative British Children's Play Survey. Parents responded to two open-ended questions pertaining to the barriers to and facilitators of children's adventurous play. Responses were analysed using a qualitative Framework Analysis, an approach suitable for managing large datasets with specific research questions.

Results: Four framework categories were identified: Social Environment; Physical Environment; Risk of Injury; Child Factors. Social Environment included barriers and facilitators related to parents, family and peers, as well as community and society. Dominant themes within the Social Environment related to perceptions about the certainty of child safety, such as supervision and the safety of society. Beliefs about the benefits of adventurous play for development and well-being were also important in the Social Environment. Physical Environment factors focused on safety and practical issues. Risk of Injury captured concerns about children being injured during play. Child Factors included child attributes, such as play preference, developmental ability and trait-like characteristics.

Conclusions: Improved understanding of what influences parent perceptions of adventurous play can inform public health interventions designed to improve children's opportunities for and engagement in adventurous play, with a view to promote children's physical and mental health.

Keywords: Adventurous play; Barriers; Children; Facilitators; Parents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

HD is funded by a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship which also funds RN’s salary. Play England, Play Wales, PlayBoardNI, HAGS and the Association of Play Industries are partners on this fellowship. Outdoor Play and Learning and Learning through Landscapes are collaborating organisations. No direct funding is received from any of these organisations. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A framework capturing parent perceived barriers to and facilitators of adventurous play. Note. +Themes identified as facilitators only. △Themes identified as barriers only. Numbers in brackets highlight the results section in which the framework categories and themes are discussed
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Recommendations for policy and interventions
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alexander SA, Frohlich KL, Fusco C. Playing for health? Revisiting health promotion to examine the emerging public health position on children’s play. Health promotion international. 2014;29(1):155–64. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das042. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dodd HF, Lester KJ. Adventurous play as a mechanism for reducing risk for childhood anxiety: a conceptual model. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2021;24:164–81. doi: 10.1007/s10567-020-00338-w. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sandseter EBH. Characteristics of risky play. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning. 2009;9(1):3–21. doi: 10.1080/14729670802702762. - DOI
    1. Coster D, Gleeve J. Give us a go! Children and young people’s views on play and risk-taking. 2008.
    1. Brussoni M, Gibbons R, Gray C, Ishikawa T, Sandseter EB, Bienenstock A, et al. What is the Relationship between Risky Outdoor Play and Health in Children? A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(6):6423–54. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120606423. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources