Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):e054310.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054310.

Study protocol: a survey exploring patients' and healthcare professionals' expectations, attitudes and ethical acceptability regarding the integration of socially assistive humanoid robots in nursing

Izidor Mlakar  1 , Tadej Kampič  2 , Vojko Flis  3 , Nina Kobilica  3 , Maja Molan  2 , Urška Smrke  4 , Nejc Plohl  5 , Andrej Bergauer  3
Affiliations

Study protocol: a survey exploring patients' and healthcare professionals' expectations, attitudes and ethical acceptability regarding the integration of socially assistive humanoid robots in nursing

Izidor Mlakar et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Population ageing, the rise of chronic diseases and the emergence of new viruses are some of the factors that contribute to an increasing share of gross domestic product dedicated to health spending. COVID-19 has shown that nursing staff represents the critical part of hospitalisation. Technological developments in robotics and artificial intelligence can significantly reduce costs and lead to improvements in many hospital processes. The proposed study aims to assess expectations, attitudes and ethical acceptability regarding the integration of socially assistive humanoid robots into hospitalised care workflow from patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives and to compare them with the results of similar studies.

Methods/design: The study is designed as a cross-sectional survey, which will include three previously validated questionnaires, the Technology-Specific Expectation Scale (TSES), the Ethical Acceptability Scale (EAS) and the Negative Attitudes towards Robots Scale (NARS). The employees of a regional clinical centre will be asked to participate via an electronic survey and respond to TSES and EAS questionaries. Patients will respond to TSES and NARS questionaries. The survey will be conducted online.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval for the study was obtained by the Medical Ethics Commission of the University Medical Center Maribor. Results will be published in a relevant scientific journal and communicated to participants and relevant institutions through dissemination activities and the ecosystem of the Horizon 2020 funded project HosmartAI (grant no. 101016834).

Ethical approval date: 06 May 2021.

Estimated start of the study: December 2021.

Keywords: Organisation of health services; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. European Commission, . The 2018 ageing report: economic and budgetary projections for the EU member states (2016–2070), 2018.
    1. OECD and. European Commision. Health at a Glance: Europe 2018, 2018.
    1. Khanna O, Beasley R, Franco D, et al. . The path to surgical robotics in neurosurgery. Oper Neurosurg 2021;20:514–20. 10.1093/ons/opab065 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang J, Peng C, Zhao Y, et al. . Application of a robotic Tele-Echography system for COVID-19 pneumonia. J Ultrasound Med 2021;40:385–90. 10.1002/jum.15406 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdi J, Al-Hindawi A, Ng T, et al. . Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open 2018;8:e018815. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018815 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types