Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):e058215.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058215.

Blood eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide and the risk of asthma attacks in randomised controlled trials: protocol for a systemic review and control arm patient-level meta-analysis for clinical prediction modelling

Affiliations

Blood eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide and the risk of asthma attacks in randomised controlled trials: protocol for a systemic review and control arm patient-level meta-analysis for clinical prediction modelling

Simon Couillard et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: The reduction of the risk of asthma attacks is a major goal of guidelines. The fact that type-2 inflammatory biomarkers identify a higher risk, anti-inflammatory responsive phenotype is potentially relevant to this goal. We aim to quantify the relation between blood eosinophils, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and the risk of severe asthma attacks.

Methods and analysis: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) will be conducted by searching MEDLINE from January 1993 to April 2021. We will include RCTs that investigated the effect of fixed treatment(s) regimen(s) on severe asthma exacerbation rates over at least 24 weeks and reported a baseline value for blood eosinophils and FeNO. Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and the methodological appraisal of the studies will be assessed by the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for RCTs. Study authors will be contacted to request anonymised individual participant data (IPD) for patients randomised to the trial's control arm. An IPD meta-analysis will be performed for multivariable prognostic modelling with performance assessment (calibration plots and the c-statistic) in a cross-validation by study procedure. The outcome to predict is the absolute number of severe asthma attacks to occur in the following 12 months if anti-inflammatory therapy is not changed (ie, annualised number of attacks requiring ≥3 days of systemic corticosteroids and/or hospitalisation if the patient was randomised to the control arm of an RCT). A summary prognostic equation and risk stratification chart will be reported as a basis for further analyses of individualised treatment benefit.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol has been reviewed by the relevant Oxford academic ethics committee and found to comprise fully anonymised data not requiring further ethical approbation. Results will be communicated in an international meeting and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.

Prospero registration number: CRD42021245337.

Keywords: asthma; epidemiology; immunology; preventive medicine; thoracic medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SC received a non-restricted research grant from Sanofi-Genzyme for investigator-initiated type 2 innovation research and received speaker honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Regeneron and AstraZeneca; outside the submitted work. ES receives royalties from Springer for the textbook entitled Clinical Prediction Models and received speaker honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline; outside the submitted work. RB has received honoraria for presentations or consulting in Adboards from AstraZeneca, Asthma and Respiratory Foundation of New Zealand, Avillion, Cipla and Theravance; and research grants from AstraZeneca, CureKids (NZ), Genentech, and the Health Research Council of New Zealand. IP: in the last 5 years, IP has received speaker’s honoraria for speaking at sponsored meetings from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Aerocrine AB, Almirall, Novartis, Teva, Chiesi, Sanofi/Regeneron, Menarini, and GSK, and payments for organising educational events from AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi/Regeneron, and Teva. He has received honoraria for attending advisory panels with Genentech, Sanofi/Regeneron, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Novartis, Teva, Merck, Circassia, Chiesi, and Knopp, and payments to support FDA approval meetings from GSK. He has received sponsorship to attend international scientific meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, AstraZeneca, Teva, and Chiesi. He has received a grant from Chiesi to support a phase 2 clinical trial in Oxford. He is copatent holder of the rights to the Leicester Cough Questionnaire and has received payments for its use in clinical trials from Merck, Bayer, and Insmed. In 2014–2015 he was an expert witness for a patent dispute involving AstraZeneca and Teva.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The prototype OxfoRd Asthma attaCk risk scaLE (ORACLE). Numbers in each cell are predicted annual asthma attack rates for patients over the age of 12 if treatment is not changed. An asthma attack is an episode of acute asthma requiring treatment with systemic steroids ≥3 days and/or hospitalisation. The blood eosinophil count is contemporaneous or the highest result in last 12 months; fractional exhaled nitric oxide level (FeNO) is contemporaneous. *Risk factors are defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines: poor symptom control (Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≥1.5), low lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s <80% predicted), adherence issues, reliever over-use (>200 dose salbutamol cannister/month), intubation or intensive care unit admission for asthma previously, comorbidities (one of: chronic rhinosinusitis, obesity, psychiatric disease), environmental exposures (one of: smoking, allergen, pollution). Reproduced from Couillard et al with permission under the original CC BY public copyright license.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) . Global strategy for asthma management and prevention (2021 update), 2021. Available: https://ginasthma.org/
    1. Bateman ED, Buhl R, O'Byrne PM, et al. . Development and validation of a novel risk score for asthma exacerbations: the risk score for exacerbations. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015;135:1457–64. 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.08.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller MK, Lee JH, Blanc PD, et al. . TENOR risk score predicts healthcare in adults with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. Eur Respir J 2006;28:1145–55. 10.1183/09031936.06.00145105 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loymans RJB, Honkoop PJ, Termeer EH, et al. . Identifying patients at risk for severe exacerbations of asthma: development and external validation of a multivariable prediction model. Thorax 2016;71:838–46. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208138 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eisner MD, Yegin A, Trzaskoma B. Severity of asthma score predicts clinical outcomes in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma. Chest 2012;141:58–65. 10.1378/chest.11-0020 - DOI - PubMed