Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;92(8):739-764.
doi: 10.1111/josh.13160. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

Evaluation of Social Impact Within Primary School Health Promotion: A Systematic Review

Dianne Robertson  1 , Julia Carins  1 , Sharyn Rundle-Thiele  1 , Jessica Harris  1
Affiliations

Evaluation of Social Impact Within Primary School Health Promotion: A Systematic Review

Dianne Robertson et al. J Sch Health. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Health promotion programs and interventions are designed to encourage behavioral changes in children, encouraging them to make safe and healthy life choices. This systematic review seeks to examine how social impact is measured in primary school health promotion interventions.

Method: A systematic search and review process was used to identify and examine primary school health promotion interventions. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to source articles from 6 electronic databases reporting school health promotion programs or interventions in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or the United Kingdom.

Results: A total of 77 studies were located, representing 55 health promotion interventions delivered in primary school settings. Of these interventions, only 8 (15%) measured or attempted to measure social impact, whereas another 8 (15%) alluded to social impact. The predominant theories reported were social based theories (theories which examine the social influences on people, environments, and behaviors) (n = 17, 59%), with almost a third not informed by an overt health promotion framework or model (n = 34, 59%). A systematic rating system identified some level of stakeholder engagement (n = 30, 53%).

Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the need for social impact measurement within health promotion to illuminate the role of school programs in delivering lasting change.

Keywords: evaluation; health promotion; primary school; social impact; stakeholder engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Diagram Showing Systematic Search Process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization . The Ottawa Charter: Principles for Health Promotion. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1986.
    1. World Health Organization . Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion a Globalised World. Bangkok, Thailand; World Health Organisation; 2005. - PubMed
    1. Speller V, Learmonth A, Harrison D. The search for evidence of effective health promotion. Br Med J. 1997;315(7104):361‐363. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Griebler U. Effects of student participation in school health promotion: a systematic review. Health Promot Int. 2017;32(2):195‐206. - PubMed
    1. Dufour S, Denoncourt J, Mishara BL. Improving Children's adaptation: new evidence regarding the effectiveness of Zippy's friends, a school mental health promotion program. Adv Sch Ment Health Promot. 2011;4(3):18‐28.

Publication types