Hard versus soft selective sweeps during domestication and improvement in soybean
- PMID: 35366022
- DOI: 10.1111/mec.16454
Hard versus soft selective sweeps during domestication and improvement in soybean
Abstract
Genome scans for selection can provide an efficient way to dissect the genetic basis of domestication traits and understand mechanisms of adaptation during crop evolution. Selection involving soft sweeps (simultaneous selection for multiple alleles) is probably common in plant genomes but is under-studied, and few if any studies have systematically scanned for soft sweeps in the context of crop domestication. Using genome resequencing data from 302 wild and domesticated soybean accessions, we conducted selection scans using five widely employed statistics to identify selection candidates under classical (hard) and soft sweeps. Across the genome, inferred hard sweeps are predominant in domesticated soybean landraces and improved varieties, whereas soft sweeps are more prevalent in a representative subpopulation of the wild ancestor. Six domestication-related genes, representing both hard and soft sweeps and different stages of domestication, were used as positive controls to assess the detectability of domestication-associated sweeps. Performance of various test statistics suggests that differentiation-based (FST ) methods are robust for detecting complete hard sweeps, and that LD-based strategies perform well for identifying recent/ongoing sweeps; however, none of the test statistics detected a known soft sweep we previously documented at the domestication gene Dt1. Genome scans yielded a set of 66 candidate loci that were identified by both differentiation-based and LD-based (iHH) methods; notably, this shared set overlaps with many previously identified QTLs for soybean domestication/improvement traits. Collectively, our results will help to advance genetic characterizations of soybean domestication traits and shed light on selection modes involved in adaptation in domesticated plant species.
Keywords: domestication; genome scan; hard sweep; soft sweep; soybean (Glycine max).
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Wild progenitors provide a sound baseline model for evolutionary analysis of domesticated crop species.Heredity (Edinb). 2023 Mar;130(3):111-113. doi: 10.1038/s41437-023-00605-w. Epub 2023 Feb 24. Heredity (Edinb). 2023. PMID: 36829043 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Population genetic concerns related to the interpretation of empirical outliers and the neglect of common evolutionary processes.Heredity (Edinb). 2023 Mar;130(3):109-110. doi: 10.1038/s41437-022-00575-5. Epub 2023 Feb 24. Heredity (Edinb). 2023. PMID: 36829044 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Akey, J. M., Zhang, G., Zhang, K., Jin, L., & Shriver, M. D. (2002). Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. Genome Research, 12(12), 1805-1814. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.631202
-
- Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J., & Lange, K. (2009). Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Research, 19(9), 1655-1664. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.094052.109
-
- Avalos, A., Pan, H., Li, C., Acevedo-Gonzalez, J. P., Rendon, G., Fields, C. J., Brown, P. J., Giray, T., Robinson, G. E., Hudson, M. E., & Zhang, G. (2017). A soft selective sweep during rapid evolution of gentle behaviour in an Africanized honeybee. Nature Communications, 8(1), 1550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01800-0
-
- Barrett, R. D. H., & Schluter, D. (2008). Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23(1), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.008
-
- Beichman, A. C., Huerta-Sanchez, E., & Lohmueller, K. E. (2018). Using genomic data to infer historic population dynamics of nonmodel organisms. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 49, 433-456. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062431
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
