Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;54(10):2703-2711.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03188-3. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

Comparison of the prevalence and associated factors of cognitive frailty between elderly and middle-young patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis

Guanjie Chen  1 , Hailin Zhang  2 , Xiaoju Du  3 , Lixia Yin  4 , Huipin Zhang  1 , Qifan Zhou  5
Affiliations

Comparison of the prevalence and associated factors of cognitive frailty between elderly and middle-young patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis

Guanjie Chen et al. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed at comparing the prevalence of cognitive frailty and explore the differences in the influencing factors between elderly and middle-young patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the frailty phenotype, mini-mental state examination, and clinical dementia rating were used to assess the current status of cognitive frailty in 852 patients receiving MHD from four hospitals in Lianyungang City and Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China; the influencing factors were then analyzed for statistical significance.

Results: Of the total 852 patients receiving MHD, 340 were classified into an elderly group (≥ 60 years) and 512 into a middle-young group (< 60 years). The prevalence of cognitive frailty was 35.9% and 8.8%, respectively. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent factors of cognitive frailty were age (P < 0.001), education level (P = 0.010), nutritional status (P = 0.001), serum albumin level (P = 0.010), calf circumference (P = 0.024), and social support level (P < 0.001) in the elderly group and comorbidity status (P = 0.037), education level (P < 0.001), nutritional status (P = 0.008), serum creatinine level (P = 0.001), waist circumference (P < 0.001), and depression (P = 0.006) in the middle-young group.

Conclusion: The prevalence of cognitive frailty was significantly higher in the elderly group than in the middle-young group, and the influencing factors differed between the two populations.

Keywords: Cognitive frailty; Hemodialysis; Influencing factor; Prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Nixon AC, Bampouras TM, Pendleton N, Woywodt A, Mitra S, Dhaygude A. Frailty and chronic kidney disease: current evidence and continuing uncertainties. Clin Kidney J. 2018;11(2):236–245. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx134. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anwar W, Ezzat H, Mohab A. Comparative study of impact of hemodialysis and renal transplantation on cognitive functions in ESRD patients. Nefrologia. 2015;35(6):567–571. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2015.07.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fabricio DM, Chagas M, Diniz BS. Frailty and cognitive decline. Transl Res. 2020;221:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.01.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelaiditi E, Cesari M, Canevelli M, Van Kan GA, Ousset PJ, Gillette-Guyonnet S, Ritz P, Duveau F, Soto ME, Provencher V, Nourhashemi F, Salva A, Robert P, Andrieu S, Rolland Y, Touchon J, Fitten JL, Vellas B. Cognitive frailty: rational and definition from an (IANA/IAGG) International Consensus Group. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013;17(9):726–734. doi: 10.1007/s12603-013-0367-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen GJ, Zhang HL, Yin LX, Du XJ, Zhang YP. Analysis on current status and influencing factors of cognitive frailty in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Chin Nurs Manag. 2021;21(8):1179–1185. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.08.013. - DOI