Is Phonology Embodied? Evidence from Mechanical Stimulation
- PMID: 35366747
- PMCID: PMC8976511
- DOI: 10.1007/s10936-022-09871-x
Is Phonology Embodied? Evidence from Mechanical Stimulation
Abstract
Across languages, certain syllables are systematically preferred to others (e.g., plaf > ptaf). Here, we examine whether these preferences arise from motor simulation. In the simulation account, ill-formed syllables (e.g., ptaf) are disliked because their motor plans are harder to simulate. Four experiments compared sensitivity to the syllable structure of labial- vs. corona-initial speech stimuli (e.g., plaf > pnaf > ptaf vs. traf > tmaf > tpaf); meanwhile, participants (English vs. Russian speakers) lightly bit on their lips or tongues. Results suggested that the perception of these stimuli was selectively modulated by motor stimulation (e.g., stimulating the tongue differentially affected sensitivity to labial vs. coronal stimuli). Remarkably, stimulation did not affect sensitivity to syllable structure. This dissociation suggests that some (e.g., phonetic) aspects of speech perception are reliant on motor simulation, hence, embodied; others (e.g., phonology), however, are possibly abstract. These conclusions speak to the role of embodiment in the language system, and the separation between phonology and phonetics, specifically.
Keywords: Abstraction; Embodiment; Motor simulation; Phonology; Sonority; Speech perception; Syllable structure.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures










References
-
- Bat-El O. The sonority dispersion principle in the acquisition of Hebrew word final codas. In: Parker S, editor. The sonority controversy. Mouton de Gruyter; 2012. pp. 319–344.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources