Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review
- PMID: 35366949
- PMCID: PMC8976970
- DOI: 10.1186/s42836-022-00115-w
Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review
Abstract
Background: Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) in revision hip arthroplasty provides direct access to the femoral medullary canal and facilitates removal of implants and re-implantation. This study looks at objective outcomes of ETO from a systematic review of the literature and a case series of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases with ETOs from the authors' local institution.
Methods: (1) The National Institutes of Health (NIH) national library of medicine was searched for studies related to ETO and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) technique were followed. (2) Case series of 23 revision THAs with ETOs from University College London Hospital (UCLH) were retrospectively analyzed with a minimum of 2-year follow-up for radiological outcomes.
Results: (1) The main revision THAs diagnoses were aseptic loosening (880/1,386; 63.4%), prosthetic joint infection (PJI) (301/1,386; 21.7%) and periprosthetic THA fractures (78/1,386; 5.6%). Other diagnoses, including non-specified reasons for THA revision in the chosen studies, accounted for 9.2% (127/1,386). The total mean was a union rate of 95.2%, an infection eradication rate of 91.6%, a femoral stem subsidence rate of 16.6%, with the rate of subsidence more than 5 mm being 10.7%. ETO proximal migration was reported in 7.8% of ETOs; however, it rarely required re-attachment (0.9%). Intraoperative fracture during revision THA with ETO was reported to be at a rate of 5%; while postoperative femoral fracture rate was at 7.8%. (2) All 24 cases had radiographic union at 3 to 6 months and there was no reported femoral stem subsidence.
Conclusion: The overall outcome of this literature review provides moderate-quality evidence indicating that ETO provides safe outcome for revision THAs in single and 2-stage revision surgeries with low ETO non-union, femoral stem subsidence, greater trochanter (GT) proximal migration and fracture rates in the different diagnoses groups of revision THA at over 2-year follow up. In the case series group, there was radiographic union of all ETOs with no reported femoral stem subsidence or periprosthetic fractures.
Keywords: Aseptic loosening; ETO; ETO union rate; Extended trochanteric osteotomy; Prosthetic joint infection; Revision hip arthroplasty.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests and they were not involved in the journal’s review of, or decisions related to this manuscript.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes and Risk Factors of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3410-3416. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.034. Epub 2020 Jul 22. J Arthroplasty. 2020. PMID: 32800436
-
Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Jul 21;13(3):e21.00003. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00003. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023. PMID: 38282724 Free PMC article.
-
Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Contemporary Outcomes of 612 Hips.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jan 20;103(2):162-173. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00215. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021. PMID: 33252587
-
Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) and fluted tapered modular stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Does ETO integrity or consolidation, really matter?J Orthop. 2021 Feb 9;23:250-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.001. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb. J Orthop. 2021. PMID: 33664557 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in 2-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Arthroplasty. 2023 Sep;38(9):1900-1907. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.073. Epub 2023 Mar 29. J Arthroplasty. 2023. PMID: 37001623
Cited by
-
[Tips and tricks of cement removal in the case of revision surgery].Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Mar;53(3):176-184. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04453-8. Epub 2023 Oct 19. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024. PMID: 37855912 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
Greater trochanteric osteotomy and subtrochanteric osteotomy in primary/revision total hip arthroplasty.Front Surg. 2023 Feb 9;10:1103689. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1103689. eCollection 2023. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 36843986 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Extended trochanteric osteotomy is a safe procedure in two-stage hip revision: a systematic review of the literature.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2695-2702. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03497-y. Epub 2023 Feb 27. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023. PMID: 36849679 Free PMC article.
-
A Novel Technique for Femoral Stem Extraction Through the Direct Anterior Approach: The Medial Episiotomy With Anterior Transfemoral Osteotomy.Arthroplast Today. 2024 Dec 9;30:101583. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101583. eCollection 2024 Dec. Arthroplast Today. 2024. PMID: 39735211 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of long monoblock, hydroxyapatite-coated stem in revision hip arthroplasty with extended trochanteric osteotomy: a multicenter study.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 3;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04377-1. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 38167438 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Benjamin V. B, O’Hara L. J, Andrew R.J, Manktelow A. R. iii Exposure and extended approaches in revision hip surgery. Orthop Traumatol. 2015;29(2):94–104.
-
- Keast-Butler O, Waddell JP. Femoral Stem Revision: Posterior Approach. In Operative Techniques: hip arthritis surgery. 2008:315-340. WB Saunders.
-
- Melnic CM, Paprosky WG. Extended trochanteric osteotomy: component retrieval andrepair. In Seminars in Arthroplasty. 2016;27(4):264-7. WB Saunders.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous