Informed consent in dentistry and medicine in Spain: Practical considerations and legality
- PMID: 35368004
- PMCID: PMC9054172
- DOI: 10.4317/medoral.25265
Informed consent in dentistry and medicine in Spain: Practical considerations and legality
Abstract
Background: The healthcare practice of dentistry, as well as medicine, is framed within a legal environment. Patients have the right to know all the information related to any action performed on them and dental or medical doctors are obliged to obtain their patient's prior written informed consent (IC) before undertaking any healthcare procedures.
Material and methods: Here we reviewed the legality and jurisprudence in Spain regarding IC. We also used INFLESZ text readability analysis software to analyse a sample of official Spanish informed consent documents (ICDs) from different surgical and interventional procedures related to dentistry and oral cavity interventions.
Results: It is a mistake to confound IC with ICDs. This error prevents physicians from considering the former as a care process in which the patient's authorisation signature is the last link in a chain formed, almost in its entirety, by the informative process and deliberation alongside the patient. Multiple factors can influence communication between practitioners and their patients. Importantly, treatment adherence is greater when patients feel involved and autonomous in shared decision-making and when the circumstances of their lives are adequately considered. We concluded that although the ICDs we analysed conformed to the requirements set out in international law, they were somewhat difficult to read according to the reading habits of the general Spanish population.
Conclusions: Knowledge about the legality of IC helps professionals to understand the problems that may arise from their non-compliance. This is because the omission or defective fulfilment of IC obligations is the origin of legal responsibility for medical practitioners. In this sense, to date, there have been more convictions for defective ICs than for malpractice. The information provided in ICs should include the risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives and must be tailored to the needs and capabilities of the patient to enable autonomous decision-making.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest None declared.
References
-
- Acea B. Informed consent in the surgical patient. Reflections on the basic law of patient autonomy. Cir Esp. 2005;77:321–6. - PubMed
-
- García-Guerrero J. Clinical information, informed consent and medical deontology. A recent relationship. Cuad Bioet. 2019;30:303–13. - PubMed
-
- Mellado JM. Autonomy, consent and responsibility. Part II. Informed consent in medical care and in the law. Radiologia. 2016;58:427–34. - PubMed
-
- Echevarria M, Ramos P, Caba F, López J, Almeida C, Cortes Gonzalez C. Factors determining patient satisfaction with the pre-anaesthesia consultation. Rev Calid Asist. 2015;30:215–9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
