Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 28:14:1759720X221083523.
doi: 10.1177/1759720X221083523. eCollection 2022.

Digital health interventions for osteoporosis and post-fragility fracture care

Affiliations
Review

Digital health interventions for osteoporosis and post-fragility fracture care

Amit Gupta et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. .

Abstract

The growing burden from osteoporosis and fragility fractures highlights a need to improve osteoporosis management across healthcare systems. Sub-optimal management of osteoporosis is an area suitable for digital health interventions. While fracture liaison services (FLSs) are proven to greatly improve care for people with osteoporosis, such services might benefit from technologies that enhance automation. The term 'Digital Health' covers a variety of different tools including clinical decision support systems, electronic medical record tools, patient decision aids, patient apps, education tools, and novel artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. Within the scope of this review are AI solutions that use algorithms within health system registries to target interventions. Clinician-targeted, patient-targeted, or system-targeted digital health interventions could be used to improve management and prevent fragility fractures. This review was commissioned by The Royal Osteoporosis Society and Bone Research Academy during the production of the 2020 Research Roadmap (https://theros.org.uk), with the intention of identifying gaps where targeted research funding could lead to improved patient health. We explore potential uses of digital technology in the general management of osteoporosis. Evidence suggests that digital technologies can support multidisciplinary teams to provide the best possible patient care based on current evidence and to support patients in self-management. However, robust randomised controlled studies are still needed to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these technologies.

Keywords: bone density; digital health; fracture; osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Sub-categories of digital health. Source: Adapted from Deloitte UK (2015).

References

    1. Mathews SC, McShea MJ, Hanley CL, et al.. Digital health: a path to validation. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 2: 38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Svedbom A, Hernlund E, Ivergård M, et al.. Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos 2013; 8: 137. - PMC - PubMed
    1. 2018 NICE impact report on falls and fragility fractures . London: British Geriatrics Society, 2020.
    1. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, et al.. A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 2004; 35: 375–382. - PubMed
    1. McLellan AR, Wolowacz SE, Zimovetz EA, et al.. Fracture Liaison Services for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture: a cost-effectiveness evaluation based on data collected over 8 years of service provision. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22: 2083–2098. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources