Transitioning to telehealth? A guide to evaluating outcomes
- PMID: 35369128
- PMCID: PMC8957891
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2022.100623
Transitioning to telehealth? A guide to evaluating outcomes
Abstract
Objectives: Telehealth use has surged since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but the evaluation of telehealth outcomes and performance has not necessarily matched the pace of its uptake. In this article we aim to guide the design of a telehealth evaluation system encompassing all four domains of the outcome measurement framework developed by the National Quality Forum (NQF) - access to care, cost, experience, and effectiveness. We aim to achieve this through proposing survey items that can be distributed to patients or clinicians as a questionnaire and providing suggestions on areas of focus for evaluation studies.
Methods: Using PubMed and Google Scholar search engines, we performed a literature review of articles related to the evaluation of telehealth outcomes that were published in English since 2000.
Results: We found existing survey tools to assist the development of an evaluation questionnaire, and categorized items into the four NQF outcome domains. For each outcome domain, we also summarize existing work on evaluation and make recommendations on areas for future assessment. In particular, we found that telehealth accessibility and accommodations have been historically under-studied and provide tools to address this.
Conclusions: Evaluating telehealth outcomes is critical to ensure efficient and high-quality care delivery, and we believe establishing an evaluation system will help practices assess and improve their telehealth systems as well as their ability to use telehealth to respond to the diverse needs of patients.
Public interest summary: Since the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telehealth use has been on the rise. Evaluating outcomes related to telehealth is critically important, but given the urgency of telehealth uptake, many health systems and practices may not yet have evaluation systems in place. This article guides the design of a telehealth evaluation system by proposing several validated and novel survey questions that can be used as part of a patient or clinician questionnaire and suggesting important measures of outcome for evaluation studies to assess across the four domains of telehealth quality as outlined by the National Quality Forum (NQF) - access to care, cost, experience, and effectiveness. We present tools to reach priority populations who often lack access to remote care, including older adults, underrepresented minorities, and people with disabilities.
Keywords: Access; Evaluation; Telehealth; Telemedicine.
© 2022 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared
Figures
Similar articles
-
Framework to Advance Oncology-Related Telehealth.JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-11. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00156. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018. PMID: 30652582
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001 Aug;(24 Suppl):1-32. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001. PMID: 11569328 Free PMC article.
-
Asynchronous telepsychiatry: A systematic review.J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Apr;27(3):137-145. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19867189. Epub 2019 Jul 29. J Telemed Telecare. 2021. PMID: 31357908
-
Satisfaction with the use of telehealth during COVID-19: An integrative review.Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2020 Nov;2:100008. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2020.100008. Epub 2020 Oct 16. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2020. PMID: 33083791 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Technological and Socio-Demographic Factors Influencing Telemedicine Literacy in Trinidad and Tobago: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Multidimensional Approach.Health Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 20;8(2):e70420. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70420. eCollection 2025 Feb. Health Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39980826 Free PMC article.
-
German Version of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and Derived Short Questionnaires for Usability and Perceived Usefulness in Health Care Assessment in Telehealth and Digital Therapeutics: Instrument Validation Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Nov 21;11:e57771. doi: 10.2196/57771. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024. PMID: 39571151 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Monthly Telehealth Regional Tracker. FAIR health n.d. http://www.fairhealth.org/states-by-the-numbers/telehealth (accessed July 2, 2020).
-
- National Quality Forum Creating a framework to support measure development for telehealth. Natl Qual Forum. 2017 https://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2017/08/Creating_a_Framework_t... (accessed June 2, 2020)
-
- Velasquez D., Mehrotra A. Ensuring The growth of telehealth during COVID-19 does not exacerbate disparities in care. Health Aff (Millwood) n.d. 2020 https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20200505.591306/full/ accessed June 10. - DOI
-
- Abelson R. N Y Times; 2020. Is telemedicine here to stay?
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources