Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 16:13:809003.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809003. eCollection 2022.

Cognitive Resilience to Psychological Stress in Military Personnel

Affiliations
Review

Cognitive Resilience to Psychological Stress in Military Personnel

Andrew Flood et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Military personnel often perform complex cognitive operations under unique conditions of intense stress. This requirement to perform diverse physical and mental tasks under stress, often with high stakes, has led to recognition of the term 'tactical athlete' for these performers. Impaired cognitive performance as a result of this stress may have serious implications for the success of military operations and the well-being of military service men and women, particularly in combat scenarios. Therefore, understanding the nature of the stress experienced by military personnel and the resilience of cognitive functioning to this stress is of great importance. This review synthesises the current state of the literature regarding cognitive resilience to psychological stress in tactical athletes. The experience of psychological stress in military personnel is considered through the lens of the Transactional Theory of stress, while offering contemporary updates and new insights. Models of the effects of stress on cognitive performance are then reviewed to highlight the complexity of this interaction before considering recent advancements in the preparation of military personnel for the enhancement of cognitive resilience. Several areas for future research are identified throughout the review, emphasising the need for the wider use of self-report measures and mixed methods approaches to better reflect the subjective experience of stress and its impact on the performance of cognitive operations.

Keywords: cognitive performance; mental fatigue; mental health; pressure; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Armour C., Ross J. (2017). The health and well-being of military drone operators and intelligence analysts: a systematic review. Mil. Psychol. 29, 83–98. doi: 10.1037/mil0000149 - DOI
    1. Arnold S. E., Louneva N., Cao K., Wang L.-S., Han L.-Y., Wolk D. A., et al. . (2013). Cellular, synaptic, and biochemical features of resilient cognition in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol. Aging 34, 157–168. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.03.004, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baer R. A., Carmody J., Hunsinger M. (2012). Weekly change in mindfulness and perceived stress in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. J. Clin. Psychol. 68, 755–765. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21865, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartone P. T. (2006). Resilience under military operational stress: can leaders influence hardiness? Mil. Psychol. 18, S131–S148. doi: 10.1207/s15327876mp1803s_10 - DOI
    1. Bartone P. T., Adler A. B., Vaitkus M. A. (1998). Dimensions of psychological stress in peacekeeping operations. Mil. Med. 163, 587–593. doi: 10.1093/milmed/163.9.587, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources