On the Reliability of the Notion of Native Signer and Its Risks
- PMID: 35369221
- PMCID: PMC8964454
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.716554
On the Reliability of the Notion of Native Signer and Its Risks
Abstract
Who is a native signer? Since around 95% of deaf infants are born into a hearing family, deaf signers are exposed to a sign language at various moments of their life, and not only from birth. Moreover, the linguistic input they are exposed to is not always a fully fledged natural sign language. In this situation, is the notion of native signer as someone exposed to language from birth of any use? We review the results of the first large-scale cross-linguistic investigation on the effects of age of exposure to sign language. This research involved about 45 Deaf adult signers in each of three sign languages (Catalan Sign Language, French Sign Language, and Italian Sign Language). Across the three languages, participants were divided into three groups - those exposed from birth, those between 1 and 5 years of age, and those exposed between 6 and 15 years of age - and received a battery of tests designed for each language targeting various aspects of morphosyntactic competence. In particular, the tests focused on both those morphosyntactic phenomena that are known from the spoken language literature to be good detectors of language impairment or delay (i.e., wh-interrogatives and relative clauses) and on morphosyntactic phenomena that are sign language specific (i.e., role shift and directional verbs). The results showed a clear effect of being native, with significant differences across languages and tests between signers exposed to sign language from birth and those exposed in the 1st years of life. This confirms the life-long importance of language exposure from birth and the reliability of the notion of "nativeness", at least for syntax. On the other hand, while in most domains the differences observed between populations might be differences in performance, for some specific constructions, signers belonging to the three groups may have different grammars. This latter finding challenges the generalized use of native signers' grammar as the baseline for language description and language assessment.
Keywords: early and late signers; effect of age of exposure; language assessment; native signer; sign languages.
Copyright © 2022 Zorzi, Giustolisi, Aristodemo, Cecchetto, Hauser, Quer, Sánchez Amat and Donati.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Aristodemo V., Friedmann N. (2019). COGONEOUTLSF- Cognitive Odd One Out Test for LSF. Handle to be Attributed. Available online at: https://www.signhub.eu/assessment/lsf
-
- Aristodemo V., Giustolisi B., Checchetto C., Donati C. (2020). “Comprehension of verb directionality in LIS and LSF,” in Proceedings of the EXLING 2020 11th International Conference of Experimental Linguistics, ed. Botinis A. (Athens), ExLing Society. 10.36505/ExLing-2020/11/0008/000423 - DOI
-
- Aristodemo V., Giustolisi B., Zorzi G., Gras D., Hauser C., Sala R., Sánchez Amat J., et al. (in press). On the nature of role shift: insights from a comprehension study in different populations of LIS, LSC, and LSF signers. Nat. Lang. Ling. Theory
-
- Aristodemo V., Hauser C., Cecchetto C., Friedmann N., Donati C. (2019). SYNTCQLSF-Content Questions Comprehension Task in LSF. Handle to be Attributed. Available online at: https://www.signhub.eu/assessment/lsf
-
- Bauman H.-D. L., Murray J. J. (2017). “Sign languages,” in The Oxford Handbook of Language and Society, eds García O., Flores N., Spotti M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 243–260.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
