Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 28;14(2):e22683.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.22683. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Semirigid Fiberglass Casting for the Early Management of Clubfoot: A Single-Center Experience

Affiliations

Semirigid Fiberglass Casting for the Early Management of Clubfoot: A Single-Center Experience

Brendan Williams et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Semirigid fiberglass (SRF) is an alternative material to plaster of Paris (POP) for idiopathic clubfoot casting in the Ponseti method. The purpose of this study was to evaluate early clinical outcomes in a series of idiopathic clubfoot patients treated with SRF at a single institution and to compare these findings to historical norms with POP casting present in the literature. Methods A series of idiopathic clubfoot patients managed exclusively with SRF in the Ponseti method was identified. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by number of casts, change in Pirani score, frequency of treatment-related complications, and frequency of surgery other than tenotomy. A comprehensive literature review was used for comparative historical norms. Results The study included 34 feet in 26 patients. Pirani score was 4.7±1.3 at presentation and 1.9±1.4 at the end of casting, representing a score change of 2.8±1.3 with SRF. Initial correction was obtained with 6.9±1.4 casts. Treatment-related complications occurred in six treated feet (17.6%) including 13 cast slippages in five feet and one cast-related thigh abrasion. A total of 25 (73.5%) feet underwent tenotomy. Two feet required an additional surgical procedure. Conclusion Clubfoot patients treated with SRF demonstrated acceptable deformity correction following Ponseti-style casting. The quantitative clinical outcomes evaluated appeared similar to norms using POP present in the literature. The findings of this study support SRF as a viable alternative to plaster casting for clubfoot correction utilizing the Ponseti method. As such, further investigation for rigorous comparative assessment is warranted.

Keywords: casting material; clubfoot; ctev; ponseti casting; semirigid fiberglass casting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Update on clubfoot: etiology and treatment. Dobbs MB, Gurnett CA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1146–1153. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV. Pediatrics. 2004;113:376–380. - PubMed
    1. Clubfoot: etiology and treatment Ignacio V. Ponseti, MD, 1914- Brand RA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1121–1123. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Treatment of clubfoot with the Ponseti method: a comparison of casting materials. Pittner DE, Klingele KE, Beebe AC. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28:250–253. - PubMed
    1. Nonsurgical management of idiopathic clubfoot. Noonan KJ, Richards BS. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:392–402. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources