Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 17:10:817010.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.817010. eCollection 2022.

The Effect of a Higher Bias Gas Flow on Imposed T-Piece Resistance and Breathing in Preterm Infants at Birth

Affiliations

The Effect of a Higher Bias Gas Flow on Imposed T-Piece Resistance and Breathing in Preterm Infants at Birth

Kristel L A M Kuypers et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Objective: The resistance created by the PEEP-valve of a T-piece resuscitator is bias gas flow dependent and might affect breathing in preterm infants. In this study we investigated the effect of a higher bias gas flow on the imposed inspiratory and expiratory T-piece resistance and expiratory breaking manoeuvres (EBM) in preterm infants during spontaneous breathing on CPAP at birth.

Methods: In a retrospective pre-post implementation study of preterm infants <32 weeks gestation, who were stabilised with a T-piece resuscitator, a bias gas flow of 12 L/min was compared to 8 L/min. All spontaneous breaths on CPAP within the first 10 min of starting respiratory support were analysed on a breath-by-breath basis to determine the breathing pattern of each breath and to calculate the imposed inspiratory and expiratory T-piece resistance (Ri, Re), flow rates and tidal volume.

Results: In total, 54 infants were included (bias gas flow 12 L/min: n = 27, 8 L/min: n = 27) with a median GA of 29+6 (28+4-30+3) and 28+5 (25+6-30+3), respectively (p = 0.182). Ri and Re were significantly lower in the 12 L/min compared to 8 L/min bias flow group [Ri: 29.6 (26.1-33.6) vs. 46.4 (43.0-54.1) cm H2O/L/s, p < 0.001; Re: 32.0 (30.0-35.1) vs. 48.0 (46.3-53.9) cm H2O/L/s, p < 0.001], while the incidence of EBM [77% (53-88) vs. 77% (58-90), p = 0.586] was similar.

Conclusion: During stabilisation of preterm infants at birth with a T-piece resuscitator, the use of a higher bias gas flow reduced both the imposed inspiratory and expiratory T-piece resistance for the infant, but this did not influence the incidence of EBMs.

Keywords: T-piece; bias gas flow; breathing; continuous positive airway pressure; imposed resistance; neonatal resuscitation; preterm infants; valve resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KK is the recipient of an unrestricted research grant from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer GL declared past co-authorships with the authors AP, KK and the absence of any ongoing collaboration with any of the authors to the handling editor.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic visualisation of flows, pressures, and resistance during spontaneous breathing.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Imposed inspiratory and expiratory resistance of the T-piece during spontaneous breathing on CPAP. The median (IQR) resistance (y-axis) for inspiration and expiration of both groups (x-axis) are presented in this boxplot. *p < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hinder M, McEwan A, Drevhammer T, Donaldson S, Tracy MB. T–piece resuscitators: how do they compare? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2019) 104:F122–7. 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314860 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wald M, Kribs A, Jeitler V, Lirsch D, Pollak A, Kirchner L. Variety of expiratory resistance between different continuous positive airway pressure devices for preterm infants. Artif Organs. (2011) 35:22–8. 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01020.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Drevhammar T, Nilsson K, Zetterstrom H, Jonsson B. Comparison of seven infant continuous positive airway pressure systems using simulated neonatal breathing. Pediatr Crit Care Med. (2012) 13:e113–9. 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31822f1b79 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donaldsson S, Drevhammar T, Li Y, Bartocci M, Rettedal SI, Lundberg F, et al. Comparison of respiratory support after delivery in infants born before 28 weeks’ gestational age: the CORSAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. (2021) 175:911–8. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1497 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donaldsson S, Drevhammar T, Taittonen L, Klemming S, Jonsson B. Initial stabilisation of preterm infants: a new resuscitation system with low imposed work of breathing for use with face mask or nasal prongs. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2017) 102:F203–7. 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310577 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources