Risk Assessment and Management for Potential Living Kidney Donors: The Role of "Third-Party" Commission
- PMID: 35372186
- PMCID: PMC8968079
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.824048
Risk Assessment and Management for Potential Living Kidney Donors: The Role of "Third-Party" Commission
Abstract
Living kidney donation is the most common type of living-donor transplant. Italian guidelines allow the living donations from emotionally related donors only after clear and voluntary consent expressed by both the donor and the recipient involved. Living donation raises ethical and legal issues because donors voluntarily undergo a surgical procedure to remove a healthy kidney in order to help another person. According to the Italian standards, the assessment of living donor-recipient pair has to be conducted by a medical "third party", completely independent from both the patients involved and the medical team treating the recipient. Starting from the Hospital "Città della Salute e della Scienza" of Turin (Italy) experience, including 116 living kidney donations, the Authors divided the evaluation process performed by the "Third-Party" Commission into four stages, with a particular attention to the potential donor. Living donation procedures should reflect fiduciary duties that healthcare providers have toward their patients, originating from the relationship of trust between physician and patient. In addition to that, the social implications are enormous if one considers the worldwide campaigns to promote public awareness about organ donation and transplantation, and to encourage people to register their organ donation decisions. The systematic process proposed here can be a tool that proactively reduces and controls the risks of coercion, organ trafficking, vitiated consent, insufficient weighting of donative choice, that could arise especially in donors involved in living kidney donation.
Keywords: healthcare safety; informed consent; kidney transplant; living organ donation; risk management; “Third-Party” Commission.
Copyright © 2022 Tattoli, Santovito, Raciti, Scarmozzino and Di Vella.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling Editor DF declared a past co-authorship with one of the author LT at the time of review.
Similar articles
-
Experience of donation and quality of life in living kidney and liver donors.Transpl Int. 2008 May;21(5):466-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00632.x. Epub 2008 Jan 21. Transpl Int. 2008. PMID: 18225994
-
Relay kidney transplantation in Korea--legal, ethical and medical aspects.Leg Med (Tokyo). 2004 Jul;6(3):178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2004.04.002. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2004. PMID: 15231288
-
Practices for Supporting and Confirming Decision-Making Involved in Kidney and Liver Donation by Related Living Donors in Japan: A Nationwide Survey.Am J Transplant. 2016 Mar;16(3):860-8. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13515. Epub 2015 Nov 10. Am J Transplant. 2016. PMID: 26555560
-
Advanced Donation Programs and Deceased Donor-Initiated Chains-2 Innovations in Kidney Paired Donation.Transplantation. 2017 Dec;101(12):2818-2824. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001838. Transplantation. 2017. PMID: 28574902 Review.
-
Ethical issues in living donor kidney transplantation.Exp Clin Transplant. 2006 Dec;4(2):485-97. Exp Clin Transplant. 2006. PMID: 17238845 Review.
Cited by
-
How to Promote the Idea of Transplantation-Second Life Social Campaign as an Example of Successful Action in Poland-What Youth Is Used to, Adults Remember.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 21;13(10):1203. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13101203. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40428039 Free PMC article.