Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 17:10:824048.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.824048. eCollection 2022.

Risk Assessment and Management for Potential Living Kidney Donors: The Role of "Third-Party" Commission

Affiliations

Risk Assessment and Management for Potential Living Kidney Donors: The Role of "Third-Party" Commission

Lucia Tattoli et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Living kidney donation is the most common type of living-donor transplant. Italian guidelines allow the living donations from emotionally related donors only after clear and voluntary consent expressed by both the donor and the recipient involved. Living donation raises ethical and legal issues because donors voluntarily undergo a surgical procedure to remove a healthy kidney in order to help another person. According to the Italian standards, the assessment of living donor-recipient pair has to be conducted by a medical "third party", completely independent from both the patients involved and the medical team treating the recipient. Starting from the Hospital "Città della Salute e della Scienza" of Turin (Italy) experience, including 116 living kidney donations, the Authors divided the evaluation process performed by the "Third-Party" Commission into four stages, with a particular attention to the potential donor. Living donation procedures should reflect fiduciary duties that healthcare providers have toward their patients, originating from the relationship of trust between physician and patient. In addition to that, the social implications are enormous if one considers the worldwide campaigns to promote public awareness about organ donation and transplantation, and to encourage people to register their organ donation decisions. The systematic process proposed here can be a tool that proactively reduces and controls the risks of coercion, organ trafficking, vitiated consent, insufficient weighting of donative choice, that could arise especially in donors involved in living kidney donation.

Keywords: healthcare safety; informed consent; kidney transplant; living organ donation; risk management; “Third-Party” Commission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling Editor DF declared a past co-authorship with one of the author LT at the time of review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Saidi RF, Hejazii Kenari SK. Challenges of organ shortage for transplantation: solutions and opportunities. Int J Organ Transplant Med. (2014) 5:87–96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lennerling A, Lovén C, Dor FJ, Ambagtsheer F, Duerinckx N, Frunza M, et al. . Living organ donation practices in Europe - results from an online survey. Transpl Int. (2013) 26:145–53. 10.1111/tri.12012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sade RM. Brain death cardiac death, and the dead donor rule. J S C Med Assoc. (2011) 107:146–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kane F, Clement G, Kane M. Live kidney donations and the ethic of care. J Med Humanit. (2008) 29:173–88. 10.1007/s10912-008-9059-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Escudero D, Otero J. Intensive care medicine and organ donation: exploring the last frontiers? Med Intensiva. (2015) 39:373–281. 10.1016/j.medine.2015.01.001 - DOI - PubMed