Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 17:10:797290.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.797290. eCollection 2022.

Evaluating and Engaging: Using Participatory Video With Kenyan Secondary School Students to Explore Engagement With Health Research

Affiliations

Evaluating and Engaging: Using Participatory Video With Kenyan Secondary School Students to Explore Engagement With Health Research

Alun Davies et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The growing ethical requirement to engage communities with health research has yielded diversification in approaches and targeted audiences. Conventional approaches like community "town-hall meetings," laboratory open-days and focus group discussions, have evolved into new methods and audiences such as community drama and school engagement with health research (SEHR) involving learning interactions between researchers and school students. While engagement practices are diversifying, evaluations of these initiatives are rare in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). This article focuses on the use of Participatory Video (PV) to explore the influence of the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme's (KWTRP) School Engagement Programme (SEP) on the views and understandings of science and research among Kenyan state secondary school students.

Methods: Twelve male and twelve female students from four coeducational schools were provided with film-making kits (1 per school), and a one-day PV training workshop. They prepared 22 short films over 8 weeks depicting their experiences and views of research and engagement and conveying their career aspirations. Schools were selected based on prior SEP participation; two schools having experienced different engagement approaches, and the others with no prior school engagement. Study data comprised footage and participant observation notes.

Results: PV provided an opportunity to simultaneously engage and evaluate to inform practice. Through student-led filmmaking, PV stimulated conversations with students about research and engagement, enabling them to share their views in a way they felt was appropriate. These interactions offered an understanding of student gains from engagement, the depth of interaction required to address perceptions held about research and the potential unintended consequences of engagement. PV also provided insights into the context and complexity of life in which engagement is situated. Understanding this context is important because of its potential influence on participation in engagement activities. We draw on these insights to make two recommendations for school engagement practice. First is that PV can provide an enjoyable and insightful means of combining engagement with evaluation. Second, given that time for SEHR is competed for against other important curricular and extracurricular activities, SEHR practitioners must ensure that activities are as beneficial and enjoyable as possible to students.

Keywords: co-production; engagement; participatory; public; schools; video.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AD, NM, and CJ were employee by The KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The PV process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multi-staged consent/assent process.
Figure 3
Figure 3
C1vid4 case study of further engagement facilitated by PV.

References

    1. Participants in the CE and Consent Workshop K, Kenya March 2011 . Consent and community engagement in diverse research contexts: reviewing and developing research and practice. J Empir Res Human Res Ethics. (2013) 8:1–18. 10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reynolds L, Sariola S. The ethics and politics of community engagement in global health research. Taylor Francis. (2018) 28:257–68. 10.1080/09581596.2018.1449598 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tindana P, de Vries J, Campbell M, Littler K, Seeley J, Marshall P, et al. . Community engagement strategies for genomic studies in Africa: a review of the literature. BMC Med Ethics. (2015) 16:24. 10.1186/s12910-015-0014-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vanderslott S, Van Ryneveld M, Marchant M, Lees S, Nolna SK, Marsh V. How can community engagement in health research be strengthened for infectious disease outbreaks in Sub-Saharan Africa? a scoping review of the literature. BMC Public Health. (2021) 21:1–16. 10.1186/s12889-021-10348-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies A, Mwangome N, Yeri B, Mwango G, Mumba N, Marsh V, et al. . Evolution of a programme to engage school students with health research and science in Kenya. Wellcome Open Res. (2019) 4:39. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15106.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources