Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 25;8(4):e1309.
doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001309. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Healthcare Professionals' Understandings of the Definition and Determination of Death: A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Healthcare Professionals' Understandings of the Definition and Determination of Death: A Scoping Review

Katina Zheng et al. Transplant Direct. .

Abstract

Background: During the 1950s, advances in critical care, and organ transplantation altered the relationship between organ failure and death. There has since been a shift away from traditional cardiocirculatory based to brain-based criteria of death, with resulting academic controversy, despite the practice being largely accepted worldwide. Our objective is to develop a comprehensive description of the current understandings of healthcare professionals regarding the meaning, definition, and determination of death.

Methods: Online databases were used to identify papers published from 2003 to 2020. Additional sources were searched for conference proceedings and theses. Two reviewers screened papers using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Complementary searches and review of reference lists complemented the final study selection. A data extraction instrument was developed to iteratively chart the results of the review. A qualitative approach was conducted to thematically analyze the data.

Results: Seven thousand four hundred twenty-eight references were identified. In total, 75 papers met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen additional papers were added from complementary searches. Most were narratives (35%), quantitative investigations (21%), and reviews (18%). Identified themes included: (1) the historical evolution of brain death (BD), (2) persistent controversies about BD and death determination, (3) wide variability in healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes, (4) critical need for BD determination revision.

Conclusions: We concluded that although BD is widely accepted, there exists variation in healthcare providers' understanding of its conceptual basis. Death determination remains a divisive issue among scholars. This review identified a need for increased opportunities for formal training on BD among healthcare providers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

L.H. is a paid consultant for Canadian Blood Services. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
PRISMA flow diagram for included studies.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
A brief timeline review of major historical events in brain death.

References

    1. Bacigalupo F, Huerta D, Montefusco-Siegmund R. The debate about death: an imperishable discussion? Biol Res. 2007;40:523–534. - PubMed
    1. Truog RD, Berlinger N, Zacharias RL, et al. . Brain death at fifty: exploring consensus, controversy, and contexts. Hastings Cent Rep. 2018;48(suppl 4):S2–S5. - PubMed
    1. Lewis A, Bonnie RJ, Pope T, et al. . Determination of death by neurologic criteria in the United States: the case for revising the uniform determination of death act. J Law Med Ethics. 2019;47:9–24. - PubMed
    1. A definition of irreversible coma. JAMA. 1968;205:337. - PubMed
    1. Shemie SD, Hornby L, Baker A, et al. ; The International Guidelines for Determination of Death phase 1 participants, in collaboration with the World Health Organization. International guideline development for the determination of death. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:788–797. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types