Outcomes in Temporary ICUs Versus Conventional ICUs: An Observational Cohort of Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- PMID: 35372841
- PMCID: PMC8963854
- DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000668
Outcomes in Temporary ICUs Versus Conventional ICUs: An Observational Cohort of Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Abstract
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, thousands of temporary ICUs have been established worldwide. The outcomes and management of mechanically ventilated patients in these areas remain unknown.
Objectives: To investigate mortality and management of mechanically ventilated patients in temporary ICUs.
Design setting and participants: Observational cohort study in a single-institution academic center. We included all adult patients with severe COVID-19 hospitalized in temporary and conventional ICUs for invasive mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome from March 23, 2020, to April 5, 2021.
Main outcomes and measures: To determine if management in temporary ICUs increased 30-day in-hospital mortality compared with conventional ICUs. Ventilator-free days, ICU-free days (both at 28 d), hospital length of stay, and ICU readmission were also assessed.
Results: We included 776 patients (326 conventional and 450 temporary ICUs). Thirty-day in-hospital unadjusted mortality (28.8% conventional vs 36.0% temporary, log-rank test p = 0.023) was higher in temporary ICUs. After controlling for potential confounders, hospitalization in temporary ICUs was an independent risk factor associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 1.4; CI, 1.06-1.83; p = 0.016).There were no differences in ICU-free days at 28 days (6; IQR, 0-16 vs 2; IQR, 0-15; p = 0.5) or ventilator-free days at 28 days (8; IQR, 0-16 vs 5; IQR, 0-15; p = 0.6). We observed higher reintubation (18% vs 12%; p = 0.029) and readmission (5% vs 1.6%; p = 0.004) rates in conventional ICUs despite higher use of postextubation noninvasive mechanical ventilation (13% vs 8%; p = 0.025). Use of lung-protective ventilation (87% vs 85%; p = 0.5), prone positioning (76% vs 79%; p = 0.4), neuromuscular blockade (96% vs 98%; p = 0.4), and COVID-19 pharmacologic treatment was similar.
Conclusions and relevance: We observed a higher 30-day in-hospital mortality in temporary ICUs. Although both areas had high adherence to evidence-based management, hospitalization in temporary ICUs was an independent risk factor associated with mortality.
Keywords: COVID-19; acute lung injury; acute respiratory distress syndrome; intensive care unit; mechanical ventilation; mortality.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Hyzy serves on the advisory board for Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, consultant for Cour Pharmaceuticals, and NOTA-Laboratories. He has textbook royalties from Springer Website and UpToDate Grants: CHEST Foundation, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury Network Medicolegal Expert witness work. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Halpern NA, Tan KS: United States resource availability for COVID-19. Available at: https://sccm.org/getattachment/Blog/March-2020/ United-States-Resource-A.... Accessed May 15, 2020
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
