Cross-border strategies for access to healthcare in violent conflict - A scoping review
- PMID: 35373166
- PMCID: PMC8971640
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2022.100093
Cross-border strategies for access to healthcare in violent conflict - A scoping review
Abstract
Background: The geographical reconfiguration of healthcare systems in times of violent conflict is increasingly being recognised in academic literature. This includes conflict-induced, cross-border travel for medical treatment. Yet the conceptual approach to this healthcare-seeking behaviour, by a population here referred to as cross-border population, remains poorly understood. This scoping review identifies academic literature on cross-border populations to map the current approach to cross-border populations and to propose a research agenda.
Methods: The study used a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review methodology. We included articles on conflicts between 1980 and 2019.
Results: A total of 53 articles met the inclusion criteria. From these articles, we distinguished four types of studies on cross-border healthcare: Direct analysis, implicit analysis, clinical research, and identification. The 45 articles belonging to the first three categories were then searched for themes specifically relevant to healthcare for cross-border populations and linked with sub-themes such as border crossing time and the types of healthcare available. These themes were structured into three main areas: access to care; quality of care; and governance of care. Our analysis then describes the available knowledge, documented practices, and challenges of cross-border healthcare specifically in conflict settings.
Conclusions: A better understanding of cross-border healthcare systems is required to inform local practices and develop related regional and international policies. While the reviewed literature provides some highlights on various practices of cross-border healthcare, there are many gaps in available knowledge of this topic. To address these gaps, our study proposes a research framework outlining key themes and research questions to be investigated by signposting where major research and operational gaps remain. This facilitates well-directed future work on cross-border therapeutic geographies in the context of armed conflict and furthers understanding of a hitherto largely ignored area of the international healthcare system.
Keywords: Access to care; Cross-border; Healthcare system; Therapeutic geography; Violent conflict.
© 2022 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Akçan R., Yıldırım M., Isak A., Tümer A.R. The unexpected effect of Syrian civil war in Turkey: Change of forensic postmortem case pattern. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2019;66:65–69. - PubMed
-
- Akkucuk S., Aydogan A., Yetim I., Ugur M., Oruc C., et al. Surgical outcomes of a civil war in a neighbouring country. BMJ Military Health. 2016;162:256–260. - PubMed
-
- Aras M., Altaş M., Yilmaz A., Serarslan Y., Yilmaz N., et al. Being a neighbor to Syria: a retrospective analysis of patients brought to our clinic for cranial gunshot wounds in the Syrian civil war. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2014;125:222–228. - PubMed
-
- Arlı C., Özkan M., Karakuş A. Incidence, etiology, and patterns of maxillofacial traumas in Syrian patients in Hatay, Turkey: A 3 year retrospective study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019;25(1):29–33. - PubMed
-
- Bahouth H., Ghantous Y., Rachmiel A., Amodi O., Abu-Elnaaj I. Maxillofacial Injuries Related to the Syrian War in the Civilian Population. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2017;75:995–1003. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous