Hysteroscopic resection vs dilation and evacuation for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 35373552
- PMCID: PMC9612857
- DOI: 10.52054/FVVO.14.1.008
Hysteroscopic resection vs dilation and evacuation for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a type of ectopic pregnancy where the fertilised egg is implanted in the muscle or fibrous tissue of the scar after a previous caesarean section. Management options for women who opted for termination of CSP include sharp curettage, dilation and evacuation (D&E), excision of trophoblastic tissues, local or systemic administration of methotrexate, bilateral hypogastric artery ligation, and selective uterine artery embolisation with curettage and/or methotrexate administration. Recently hysteroscopic resection has also been proposed as an alternative option.
Objective: To compare the surgical outcome of hysteroscopic resection with dilation and evacuation (D&E) for the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).
Methods: Parallel-group, non-blinded, randomised clinical trial conducted at a single centre in Italy. Eligible women are those with singleton gestations at less than 9 weeks of gestation, and with thickness of myometrial layer ≥1 mm at the level of the ectopic. Inclusion criteria are women with CSP with positive embryonic/fetal heart activity who opted for termination of pregnancy. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to receive either hysteroscopic resection (i.e. intervention group) or D&E (i.e. control group). In both groups, 50 mg/m2 (based on DuBois formula for body surface area) of methotrexate (MTX) will be injected intramuscularly at the time of randomisation (day 1) and another dose at day 3. A third dose of MTX is planned in case of persistence of fetal heart activity on day 5. Participants will receive either D&E or hysteroscopic resection from 3 to 7 days after the last dose of MTX. A sample size of 54 women is planned.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome is the success rate of the treatment protocol, defined as no requirement for further treatment until complete resolution of the CSP as demonstrated by negative beta hCG levels and absence of residual gestational material on ultrasound examination..
Study hypothesis: Hysteroscopic surgery is superior to D&E for the treatment of CSP.
What is new?: The results of the trial will provide information on the best treatment for CSP.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Hysteroscopic resection vs ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation for treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;229(4):437.e1-437.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.038. Epub 2023 May 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37142075 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of efficacies between ultrasound-guided curettage combined with hysteroscopic electro-resection after injection of pituitrin and hysteroscopic electro-resection after methotrexate chemotherapy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;42(7):3041-3047. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2081793. Epub 2022 Jun 7. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 35672873
-
[Clinical study on 39 cases with caesarean scar pregnancy with sonographic mass].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;49(1):10-3. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 24694910 Chinese.
-
Different treatment modalities for cesarean scar pregnancies: a single-center experience and literature review.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 May;303(5):1143-1151. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05831-9. Epub 2020 Oct 13. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33048187 Review.
-
Methotrexate vs placebo in early tubal ectopic pregnancy: a multi- centre double-blind randomised trial.Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2012 Aug;7(3):238-43. doi: 10.2174/157488712802281321. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2012. PMID: 22540910 Review.
Cited by
-
Scar Ectopic Pregnancy as an Uncommon Site of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review.Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 31;13(11):2151. doi: 10.3390/life13112151. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38004291 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG. 2007 Mar;114:253–263. - PubMed
-
- Birch Petersen K, Hoffmann E, Rifbjerg C, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:958–967. - PubMed
-
- Calì G, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, et al. Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:169–175. - PubMed
-
- Deans R, Abbott J. Hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1735–1740. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources