Types of diet, obesity, and incident type 2 diabetes: Findings from the UK Biobank prospective cohort study
- PMID: 35373896
- PMCID: PMC9325356
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.14711
Types of diet, obesity, and incident type 2 diabetes: Findings from the UK Biobank prospective cohort study
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the associations between types of diet and incident type 2 diabetes and whether adiposity mediated these associations.
Materials and methods: In total, 203 790 participants from UK Biobank (mean age 55.2 years; 55.8% women) without diabetes at baseline were included in this prospective study. Using the dietary intake data self-reported at baseline, participants were categorized as vegetarians (n = 3237), fish eaters (n = 4405), fish and poultry eaters (n = 2217), meat eaters (n = 178 004) and varied diet (n = 15 927). The association between type of diet and incident type 2 diabetes was investigated using Cox-proportional hazards models with a 2-year landmark analysis. The mediation role of adiposity was tested under a counterfactual framework.
Results: After excluding the first 2 years of follow-up, the median follow-up was 5.4 (IQR: 4.8-6.3) years, during which 5067 (2.5%) participants were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. After adjusting for lifestyle factors, fish eaters (HR 0.52 [95% CI: 0.39-0.69]) and fish and poultry eaters (HR 0.62 [95% CI: 0.45-0.88]) had a lower risk of incident type 2 diabetes compared with meat eaters. The association for vegetarians was not significant. Varied diet had a higher risk of type 2 diabetes. Obesity partially mediated the association of fish (30.6%), fish and poultry (49.8%) and varied (55.2%) diets.
Conclusions: Fish eaters, as well as fish and poultry eaters, were at a lower risk of incident type 2 diabetes than meat eaters, partially attributable to lower obesity risk.
Keywords: fish; lacto-ovo diet; meat; poultry; type 2 diabetes; vegetarian.
© 2022 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no potential conflicts of interests. The funders have no role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Figures
References
-
- International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas, ninth edition; 2019; Brussels, Belgium. Available at: https://www.diabetesatlas.org access September 2020
-
- Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843. - PubMed
-
- Diabetes UK . Diabetes facts and stats; 2019. Accessed September 2020. https://www.diabetes.org.uk/professionals/position-statements-reports/st....
-
- Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):88‐98. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
