Prediction of Discharge Status and Readmissions after Resection of Intradural Spinal Tumors
- PMID: 35378587
- PMCID: PMC8987552
- DOI: 10.14245/ns.2143244.622
Prediction of Discharge Status and Readmissions after Resection of Intradural Spinal Tumors
Abstract
Objective: Intradural spinal tumors are uncommon and while associations between clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes have been explored, there remains a paucity of literature unifying diverse predictors into an integrated risk model. To predict postresection outcomes for patients with spinal tumors.
Methods: IBM MarketScan Claims Database was queried for adult patients receiving surgery for intradural tumors between 2007 and 2016. Primary outcomes-of-interest were nonhome discharge and 90-day postdischarge readmissions. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization duration and postoperative complications. Risk modeling was developed using a regularized logistic regression framework (LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) and validated in a withheld subset.
Results: A total of 5,060 adult patients were included. Most surgeries utilized a posterior approach (n = 5,023, 99.3%) and tumors were most commonly found in the thoracic region (n = 1,941, 38.4%), followed by the lumbar (n = 1,781, 35.2%) and cervical (n = 1,294, 25.6%) regions. Compared to models using only tumor-specific or patient-specific features, our integrated models demonstrated better discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] [nonhome discharge] = 0.786; AUC [90-day readmissions] = 0.693) and accuracy (Brier score [nonhome discharge] = 0.155; Brier score [90-day readmissions] = 0.093). Compared to those predicted to be lowest risk, patients predicted to be highest-risk for nonhome discharge required continued care 16.3 times more frequently (64.5% vs. 3.9%). Similarly, patients predicted to be at highest risk for postdischarge readmissions were readmitted 7.3 times as often as those predicted to be at lowest risk (32.6% vs. 4.4%).
Conclusion: Using a diverse set of clinical characteristics spanning tumor-, patient-, and hospitalization-derived data, we developed and validated risk models integrating diverse clinical data for predicting nonhome discharge and postdischarge readmissions.
Keywords: Intradural spine tumor; Machine learning; Predictive modeling.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Shin JH, Benzel EC. Intradural extramedullary spine tumors. Contemp Spine Surg. 2012;13:1–7.
-
- Singh H, Patir R, Vaishya S, et al. Application of a far-lateral approach to the subaxial spine: application, technical difficulties, and results. World Neurosurg. 2017;100:167–72. - PubMed
-
- Kim CH, Chung CK. Surgical outcome of a posterior approach for large ventral intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:E531–7. - PubMed
-
- Patil CG, Patil TS, Lad SP, et al. Complications and outcomes after spinal cord tumor resection in the United States from 1993 to 2002. Spinal Cord. 2008;46:375–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
