Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;29(4):1514-1523.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02092-2. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

Forced-exposure trials increase suboptimal choice

Margaret A McDevitt  1 , Jeffrey M Pisklak  2 , Roger M Dunn  3 , Marcia L Spetch  2
Affiliations

Forced-exposure trials increase suboptimal choice

Margaret A McDevitt et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

The influence of single option or forced-exposure (FE) trials was studied in the suboptimal choice task. Pigeons chose between an optimal alternative that led to food half of the time and a suboptimal alternative that led to food 20% of the time. Choice of the suboptimal alternative was compared across groups of subjects that received different numbers of FE trials during training. In Experiment 1, subjects received 100% FE trials, 67% FE trials, or only choice trials. Pigeons in the two groups that had FE trials developed extreme preference for the signaled suboptimal alternative over the unsignaled optimal alternative, while pigeons that had no FE trials showed pronounced individual differences. Experiment 2 compared 10% and 90% FE trials. When neither alternative signaled trial outcomes, both groups of subjects strongly preferred the optimal alternative. When the suboptimal alternative provided differential signals, the subjects in the 90% FE group developed strong preference for the suboptimal alternative and subjects in the 10% FE group maintained preference for the optimal alternative. The results of both experiments demonstrate that FE trials can have substantial effects on the development of preference in the suboptimal choice task.

Keywords: Conditioned reinforcement; Forced choice, Forced-exposure trials; Keypeck; Pigeon; Suboptimal choice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alsop, B., & Davison, M. (1986). Preference for multiple versus mixed schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1986.45-33 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Baum, W. M. (2021). Behavioral ephemera, difficult discriminations, and behavioral stability. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.719.1-18 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belke, T. W., & Spetch, M. L. (1994). Choice between reliable and unreliable reinforcement alternatives revisited: Preference for unreliable reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1994.62-353 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bromberg-Martin, E. S., & Hikosaka, O. (2009). Midbrain dopamine neurons signal preference for advance information about upcoming rewards. Neuron, 63(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.009 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Case, J. P., & Zentall, T. R. (2018). Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Does the predictive value of the conditioned reinforcer alone determine choice? Behavioural Processes, 157, 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.018 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources