Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 4;12(4):e055812.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055812.

Smoking cessation strategy in the national cervical cancer screening program (SUCCESS): study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised trial and process evaluation in Dutch general practice

Affiliations

Smoking cessation strategy in the national cervical cancer screening program (SUCCESS): study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised trial and process evaluation in Dutch general practice

Marthe Bl Mansour et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer screening in general practice could be a routine moment to provide female smokers with stop smoking advice and support. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of a stop smoking strategy delivered by trained practice assistants after the cervical smear, and to evaluate the implementation process.

Methods and analysis: The study is a two-arm, pragmatic cluster randomised trial, in Dutch general practice. Randomisation takes place 1:1 at the level of the general practice. Practices either deliver the SUCCESS stop smoking strategy or the usual care condition. The strategy consists of brief stop smoking advice based on the Ask-Advise-Connect method and is conducted by trained practice assistants after routine cervical cancer screening. The primary outcome is the performance of a serious quit attempt in the 6 months after screening. Secondary outcomes are 7-day point prevalence abstinence, reduction in the number of cigarettes per day and transition in motivation to quit smoking. Follow-up for these measurements takes place after 6 months. Analysis on the primary outcome aims to detect a 10% difference between treatment arms (0.80 power, p=0.05, using a one-sided test), and will be performed according to the intention to treat principle. The process evaluation will assess feasibility, acceptability and barriers or enablers to the strategy's implementation. For this purpose, both qualitative and quantitative data will be collected via questionnaires and in-depth interviews, respectively, in both individual study participants and involved staff.

Ethics and dissemination: The Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport approved of the trial after an advisory report from the Health Council (Nr. 2018/17). A licence was provided to conduct the study under the Population Screening Act. Study results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NL5052 (NTR7451).

Keywords: preventive medicine; primary care; protocols & guidelines; substance misuse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart for study participants of the SUCCESS study. Practice(s) = participating general practice(s). *Baseline questionnaire for all study participants from both treatment arms (intervention and control practices) = Questionnaire T1; Questionnaire at 2 weeks follow-up for female smokers participating in the intervention arm = Questionnaire T1B-S-I (T1B-smoker-intervention); Questionnaire at 6 months follow-up: for non-smokers in both treatment arms = Questionnaire T2-NS (T2-non-smokers), for smokers in the intervention arm = Questionnaire T2-S-I (T2-smoker-intervention), for smokers in the control arm = Questionnaire T2-S-C (T2-smoker-control). PA, practice assistant.

Similar articles

References

    1. Jha P, Peto R. Global effects of smoking, of quitting, and of taxing tobacco. N Engl J Med 2014;370:60–8. 10.1056/NEJMra1308383 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jha P, Ramasundarahettige C, Landsman V, et al. . 21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States. N Engl J Med 2013;368:341–50. 10.1056/NEJMsa1211128 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vineis P, Alavanja M, Buffler P, et al. . Tobacco and cancer: recent epidemiological evidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:99–106. 10.1093/jnci/djh014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown KF, Rumgay H, Dunlop C, et al. . The fraction of cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the United Kingdom in 2015. Br J Cancer 2018;118:1130–41. 10.1038/s41416-018-0029-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lanting C, de Vroome E, Elias S. De bijdrage van leefstijlfactoren AAN de incidentie van en de sterfte AAN kanker in Nederland: TNO; TNO-rapport, 2014. Available: https://www.kwf.nl/sites/default/files/2019-09/eindrapport-paf-studie.pdf

Publication types

MeSH terms