Preoperative factors associated with optimal outcomes of selective thoracic fusion at 5 years
- PMID: 35380352
- DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00500-0
Preoperative factors associated with optimal outcomes of selective thoracic fusion at 5 years
Abstract
Purpose: Prior work identified optimal outcomes at 2 years following selective thoracic fusion (STF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) but it is unclear whether these published predictors represent what is required to achieve an optimal outcome with further time and potential growth. The purpose of this study was to determine the preoperative factors associated with optimal outcome of STF for AIS at 5 years.
Methods: Patients with primary thoracic AIS (Lenke 1-4C curves) who underwent a STF and had minimum 5 years of follow-up were included. Optimal postoperative outcomes for a STF included a deformity-flexibility quotient (DFQ) < 4, lumbar curve < 26°, lumbar correction > 37%, C7-CSVL < 2 cm, lumbar prominence < 5°, and trunk shift < 1.5 cm. These outcomes were used to determine whether adhering to published recommendations for STF increased the likelihood of obtaining an optimal outcome at 5 years, which included: preoperative lumbar curve < 45°, lumbar bend < 25°, apical vertebral translation ratio > 1.2, and thoracic/thoracolumbar Cobb ratio > 1.2.
Results: 127 patients met inclusion. A preoperative lumbar curve < 45° was associated with an increased likelihood of achieving three of the optimal outcomes: DFQ < 4, lumbar curve < 26°, and lumbar prominence < 5°. Following the 25° bend rule resulted in two optimal outcomes, while Cobb ratio > 1.2 was only associated with one optimal outcome. AVT > 1.2 was not significantly associated with any optimal outcome measures.
Conclusion: This study found that at 5 years, performing a STF when there is a preoperative lumbar Cobb < 45° remained the best guideline for increasing the likelihood of an optimal outcome.
Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Lumbar curve; Outcomes; Selective thoracic fusion.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
References
-
- Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1169–1181 - DOI
-
- Lenke LG, Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH (2003) The Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how it organizes curve patterns as a template to perform selective fusions of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:S199–S207 - DOI
-
- Newton PO, Faro FD, Lenke LG et al (2003) Factors involved in the decision to perform a selective versus nonselective fusion of Lenke 1B and 1C (King-Moe II) curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:S217–S223 - DOI
-
- Marks M, Newton PO, Petcharaporn M et al (2012) Postoperative segmental motion of the unfused spine distal to the fusion in 100 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:826–832 - DOI
-
- Demura S, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP et al (2013) Is decompensation preoperatively a risk in Lenke 1C curves? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E649–E655 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous