Glaucoma Evaluation and Management in Eyes With Boston Type 1 and Aurolab Keratoprostheses in an Indian Cohort
- PMID: 35383615
- DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002986
Glaucoma Evaluation and Management in Eyes With Boston Type 1 and Aurolab Keratoprostheses in an Indian Cohort
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate glaucoma and its management in eyes with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (Boston-Kpro) and Aurolab keratoprosthesis (Auro-Kpro) in an Indian cohort.
Methods: This retrospective comparative case series included 175 eyes of 175 patients who underwent type 1 keratoprosthesis from 2009 until 2017; type 1 Boston-Kpro was performed in 107 eyes (107 patients) and Auro-Kpro in 68 eyes (68 patients). The eyes with <1-month follow-up were excluded, and hence, for the analysis of glaucoma, 62 eyes with Auro-Kpro and 99 eyes with Boston-Kpro were included. Progression was defined as the worsening of optic disc damage/progression by visual field/uncontrolled IOP needing additional medications or glaucoma surgery.
Results: The post-Kpro mean follow-up was 1.8 ± 1.7 years. After Kpro, overall glaucoma was noted in 61% of eyes (98/161). Preexisting glaucoma was noted in 28% of eyes (45/161), postoperative glaucoma was noted in 33% of eyes (53/161), and 39% of eyes (63/161) did not have glaucoma. Among those with preexisting glaucoma, 49% of eyes (22/45) progressed after Kpro implantation. The proportion of eyes with glaucoma in Auro-Kpro (56.5% of eyes) and Boston-Kpro (63.6% of eyes) was similar (P = 0.46). The Kaplan-Meier curve for cumulative survival (Kpro-retention rate) was similar in eyes with and without glaucoma (83% vs. 76% at 1 year, 72% vs. 70% at 2 years; P = 0.65). A higher number of prior intraocular surgeries (P = 0.04) was significantly associated with risk for postoperative glaucoma.
Conclusions: Glaucoma was seen in more than half of the eyes with type 1 keratoprosthesis. The presence of glaucoma did not seem to affect the retention of keratoprosthesis. A high rate of postoperative glaucoma and the progression of preexisting glaucoma need close monitoring and appropriate management.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Comment in
-
Glaucoma Evaluation and Management in Eyes with Boston Type 1 and Aurolab Keratoprostheses in an Indian Cohort.Cornea. 2022 Dec 1;41(12):e26. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003132. Epub 2022 Sep 28. Cornea. 2022. PMID: 36197336 No abstract available.
References
-
- Aldave AJ, Kamal KM, Vo RC, et al. The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications. Ophthalmology 2009;116:640–651.
-
- Zerbe BL, Belin MW, Ciolino JB, et al. Results from the multicenter Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis study. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1779–1784. e1771.
-
- Khan BF, Harissi-Dagher M, Khan DM, et al. Advances in Boston keratoprosthesis: enhancing retention and prevention of infection and inflammation. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2007;47:61–71.
-
- Harissi-Dagher M, Beyer J, Dohlman CH. The role of soft contact lenses as an adjunct to the Boston keratoprosthesis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2008;48:43–51.
-
- Kamyar R, Weizer JS, de Paula FH, et al. Glaucoma associated with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis. Cornea 2012;31:134.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
