Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;11(8):930-937.
doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1093. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

Effects of Unsuppressed Endogenous Insulin on Pharmacokinetics and/or Pharmacodynamics of Study Insulin in the Healthy: A Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Effects of Unsuppressed Endogenous Insulin on Pharmacokinetics and/or Pharmacodynamics of Study Insulin in the Healthy: A Retrospective Study

Hui Liu et al. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

C-peptide, a marker of endogenous insulin, should be consistently inhibited during euglycemic clamping, while an elevated postdosing C-peptide (CPpostdosing ) is not an occasional phenomenon. This was a retrospective study that included 33 men who underwent a manual euglycemic clamp with a subcutaneous injection of insulin aspart (IAsp) aiming to describe the effects of insufficient suppression of endogenous insulin on estimates of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of injected insulin. The time profiles of whole blood glucose, human insulin, glucose infusion rate (GIR), and C-peptide were recorded. The subjects were divided into 2 groups at a ratio of 2:1: group A ([CPpostdosing ]max >baseline CP [CPbaseline ]), group B ([CPpostdosing ]max ≤ CPbaseline ). The endogenous insulin was approximately equal to the measured value of human insulin or calculated from the C-peptide. The basal glucose, CPbaseline , basal human insulin, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, IAsp dose, and demographic statistics were all comparable between the 2 groups except the "clamped" glucose. The average clamped glucose was 99.7% (group A) and 94.9% (group B) of baseline. After correction for clamped glucose, GIR area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 8 hours was higher in group A (P < .05) under comparable IAsp exposure. Endogenous insulin area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 8 hours calculated from C-peptide was different from that measured from human insulin in group A (P < .05), whereas no statistical difference between these measures was observed in group B. Hence, blood glucose should be controlled below the baseline to ensure the inhibition of endogenous insulin. Unsuppressed endogenous insulin may contribute to observed GIR, and the endogenous insulin-corrected pharmacokinetics estimated by C-peptide may be inaccurate with insufficient endogenous insulin suppression.

Keywords: C-peptide; endogenous insulin secretion; euglycemic clamp; insulin pharmacodynamics; insulin pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time profiles of the ratio of “clamped” blood glucose to basal blood glucose (A), glucose infusion rate level (B), insulin aspart concentration (C), and C‐peptide level (D) during the euglycemic clamp (mean ± standard error).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A, B) Time profiles of endogenous insulin measured by human insulin or calculated by C‐peptide during the euglycemic clamp in groups A and B, respectively; (C) relationship between coefficient of variation of blood glucose (CVBG) and the highest rate of increase of C‐peptide after dosing (CPpostdosing) from basal C‐peptide (CPbaseline); (D) changes of the area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) of increases of blood glucose and human insulin from their baselines per hour (mean ± standard error).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bhatia A, Tawade S, Mastim M, et al. Comparative evaluation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin glargine (Glaritus(R) and Lantus(R)) in healthy subjects: a double‐blind, randomized clamp study. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55(5):461‐468. - PubMed
    1. de la Pena A, Seger M, Soon D, et al. Bioequivalence and comparative pharmacodynamics of insulin lispro 200 U/mL relative to insulin lispro (Humalog(R)) 100 U/mL. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2016;5(1):69‐75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sinha VP, Choi SL, Soon DK, et al. Single‐dose pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of the novel, long‐acting basal insulin LY2605541 in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54(7):792‐799. - PubMed
    1. Zhang X, Lam ECQ, Seger ME, et al. LY2963016 Insulin Glargine and Insulin Glargine (Lantus) produce comparable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics at two dose levels. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2017;6(6):556‐563. - PubMed
    1. de la Pena A, Yeo KP, Linnebjerg H, et al. Subcutaneous injection depth does not affect the pharmacokinetics or glucodynamics of insulin lispro in normal weight or healthy obese subjects. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9(4):824‐830. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types