Learning from experience: Within- and between-person associations of the consequences, frequency, and versatility of nonsuicidal self-injury
- PMID: 35385177
- DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12867
Learning from experience: Within- and between-person associations of the consequences, frequency, and versatility of nonsuicidal self-injury
Abstract
Objective: Behavioral models of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) propose that experiencing desirable consequences following NSSI reinforces the behavior. However, these models do not specify whether experiencing more desirable consequences relative to other people (between-person), an individual's own average (within-person), or both, predicts NSSI severity. To address this gap, this study investigated the prospective, within- and between-person associations of desirable NSSI consequences with NSSI frequency (number of episodes) and versatility (number of methods).
Methods: Two hundred and ten individuals (93.81% female, Mage = 22.95) with a history of NSSI completed online surveys assessing NSSI consequences, frequency, and versatility every three months for one year.
Results: Within-person increases in desirable emotional consequences were unrelated to NSSI frequency three months later but predicted increases in NSSI versatility. Within-person increases in desirable social consequences predicted decreases in NSSI frequency three months later but were unrelated to NSSI versatility. Between-person variability in desirable consequences was unrelated to NSSI severity.
Conclusions: Findings were partially consistent with behavioral models of NSSI. Going forward, we recommend that: (1) behavioral models articulate the salience of within-person fluctuations in consequences; (2) research clarifies the role of social consequences; and (3) clinicians use repeated assessments of emotional consequences to identify periods of elevated NSSI risk.
Keywords: behavioral models; consequences; frequency; functions; nonsuicidal self-injury; versatility; within-person.
© 2022 The American Association of Suicidology.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ammerman, B. A., Jacobucci, R., Turner, B. J., Dixon-Gordon, K. L., & McCloskey, M. S. (2020). Quantifying the importance of lifetime frequency versus number of methods in conceptualizing nonsuicidal self-injury severity. Psychology of Violence, 10(4), 442-451. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000263
-
- Andrewes, H. E., Hulbert, C., Cotton, S. M., Betts, J., & Chanen, A. M. (2017). Ecological momentary assessment of nonsuicidal self-injury in youth with borderline personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(4), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000205
-
- Andrews, T., Martin, G., Hasking, P., & Page, A. (2013). Predictors of continuation and cessation of nonsuicidal self-injury. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.009
-
- Anestis, M. D., Khazem, L. R., & Law, K. C. (2015). How many times and how many ways: The impact of number of nonsuicidal self-injury methods on the relationship between nonsuicidal self-injury frequency and suicidal behavior. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 45(2), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12120
-
- Armey, M. F., Crowther, J. H., & Miller, I. W. (2011). Changes in ecological momentary assessment reported affect associated with episodes of nonsuicidal self-injury. Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 579-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.002
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
