Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;69(6):1231-1244.
doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01631-w. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

OECD Case Studies of Integrated Regional and Strategic Impact Assessment: What Does 'Integration' Look Like in Practice?

Lauren Arnold  1 , Rob Friberg  1 , Kevin Hanna  1 , Chris G Buse  2
Affiliations

OECD Case Studies of Integrated Regional and Strategic Impact Assessment: What Does 'Integration' Look Like in Practice?

Lauren Arnold et al. Environ Manage. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Increasingly, protocols for assessing the impacts of land-uses and major resource development projects focus not only on environmental impacts, but also social and human health impacts. Regional and Strategic Environmental Assessment (RSEAs) are one innovation that hold promise at better integrating these diverse land-use values into planning, assessment, and decision-making. In this contribution, a realist review methodology is utilized to identify case studies of "integrated RSEA"-those which are strategic, have a regional assessment approach, and seek to integrate environmental, community and health impacts into a singular assessment architecture. The results of a systematic literature review are described and six RSEA-like case studies are identified: Kimberly Browse LNG SEA; HS2 Appraisal of Sustainability; Lisbon International Airport SEA; Beaufort Regional Environmental Assessment; Nordstream 2 Transboundary EIA; and the Portland Harbour Sustainability Project. The case studies are examined according to their unique contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of their assessment protocols to determine the degree to which they consider more than environmental valued components, and the means by which they were included. Findings suggest that RSEA has a contentious relationship with the integration of more than environmental values, but that there are significant lessons to be learned to support project planning, especially for assessment contexts characterized by large, transboundary projects.

Keywords: Environmental impact assessment; Integrated impact assessment; Land-use planning; Regional environmental assessment; Strategic environmental assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Case study selection process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Apitz SE, Fitzpatrick AG, McNally A, Harrison D, Coughlin C, Edwards DA. Stakeholder value-linked sustainability assessment: Evaluating remedial alternatives for the Portland harbor superfund site, Portland, Oregon, USA. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018;14(1):43–62. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1998. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaufort Regional Environmental Assessment Key Findings: Research and Working Group Results 2011–2015 (2016). https://www.beaufortrea.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/NCR-10615510-v1-BR...
    1. Beckwith JA. A social impact perspective on the Browse LNG Precinct strategic assessment in Western Australia. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 2012;30(3):189–194. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2012.715830. - DOI
    1. Bidstrup M, Kornov L, Partidario MR. Cumulative effects in strategic environmental assessment: The influence of plan boundaries. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2016;57:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.12.003. - DOI
    1. Bidstrup M, Hansen AM. The paradox of strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2014;47:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.03.005. - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources