Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 27:2022:8900940.
doi: 10.1155/2022/8900940. eCollection 2022.

Bone Augmentation for Implant Placement: Recent Advances

Affiliations
Review

Bone Augmentation for Implant Placement: Recent Advances

Van Viet Dam et al. Int J Dent. .

Abstract

There are various advancements in biomaterials and methods for bone augmentation. This article aims to review the recent advances in bone augmentation for dental implants. Relevant articles on bone augmentation for dental implants were searched in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Science Direct published in English literature published between January 1996 and March 2021. Relevant studies on bone grafts for dental implants were included and critically analyzed in this review. Various biomaterials can be used to augment bone for implant placement. Each graft procedure has advantages and disadvantages in each clinical application and needs to choose the graft material with a high success rate and less morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the method for the selection of articles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fibula free flap in the mandibular arch: clinical pictures (a, b) and 3D views (c, d).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Types of ordinary or activated bone grafts [22].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Osteoblastic lineage cells at the bone-repair site as a source of VEGF at postsurgery day 7 in WT mice. (a) A low density of anti-VEGF staining (red) in Vegfafl/fl Osx-Cre/ZsG mice (6.1%) compared with Osx-Cre/ZsG mice (15.5%). (b) VEGF in cortical bone, trabecular bone, and the newly formed bone within cortical defects. Black arrows show the VEGF-expressing osteoblast lining. TB = trabecular bone and CB = endosteum of cortical bone [52].

References

    1. Alhammadi M. S., Al-Mashraqi A. A., Alnami R. H., et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of facial measurements of digital photographs and wrapped cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) photographs. Diagnostics . 2021;11(5):p. 757. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050757. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rokaya D., Suttagul K., Sapkota B., Maharjan S. K. Gender based comparison of the relationships of maxillary anterior teeth and facial measurements. Journal of International Dental Medical Research . 2018;11(1):465–469.
    1. Rokaya D., Bhattarai B., Suttagul K., Kafle D., Humagain M. Mentolabial sulcus: an esthetic-based classification. Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University . 2018;13(1):16–19. doi: 10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_80_17. - DOI
    1. Humagain M., Rokaya D., Srii R., Dixit S., Kafle D. Gender based comparison of gingival zenith esthetics. Kathmandu University Medical Journal (KUMJ) . 2016;14(54):148–152. - PubMed
    1. Papathanasiou E., Finkelman M., Hanley J., Parashis A. O. Prevalence, etiology and treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a survey of periodontists in the United States. Journal of Periodontology . 2016;87(5):493–501. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.150476. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources