Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):91.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01831-8.

The use of electronic health records to inform cancer surveillance efforts: a scoping review and test of indicators for public health surveillance of cancer prevention and control

Sarah Conderino  1 , Stefanie Bendik  2 , Thomas B Richards  3 , Claudia Pulgarin  2 , Pui Ying Chan  4 , Julie Townsend  3 , Sungwoo Lim  4 , Timothy R Roberts  5 , Lorna E Thorpe  2
Affiliations

The use of electronic health records to inform cancer surveillance efforts: a scoping review and test of indicators for public health surveillance of cancer prevention and control

Sarah Conderino et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Introduction: State cancer prevention and control programs rely on public health surveillance data to set objectives to improve cancer prevention and control, plan interventions, and evaluate state-level progress towards achieving those objectives. The goal of this project was to evaluate the validity of using electronic health records (EHRs) based on common data model variables to generate indicators for surveillance of cancer prevention and control for these public health programs.

Methods: Following the methodological guidance from the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews, we conducted a literature scoping review to assess how EHRs are used to inform cancer surveillance. We then developed 26 indicators along the continuum of the cascade of care, including cancer risk factors, immunizations to prevent cancer, cancer screenings, quality of initial care after abnormal screening results, and cancer burden. Indicators were calculated within a sample of patients from the New York City (NYC) INSIGHT Clinical Research Network using common data model EHR data and were weighted to the NYC population using post-stratification. We used prevalence ratios to compare these estimates to estimates from the raw EHR of NYU Langone Health to assess quality of information within INSIGHT, and we compared estimates to results from existing surveillance sources to assess validity.

Results: Of the 401 identified articles, 15% had a study purpose related to surveillance. Our indicator comparisons found that INSIGHT EHR-based measures for risk factor indicators were similar to estimates from external sources. In contrast, cancer screening and vaccination indicators were substantially underestimated as compared to estimates from external sources. Cancer screenings and vaccinations were often recorded in sections of the EHR that were not captured by the common data model. INSIGHT estimates for many quality-of-care indicators were higher than those calculated using a raw EHR.

Conclusion: Common data model EHR data can provide rich information for certain indicators related to the cascade of care but may have substantial biases for others that limit their use in informing surveillance efforts for cancer prevention and control programs.

Keywords: Common data model; Early detection of cancer; Electronic health records; Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network; Public health informatics; Public health surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scoping review flow diagram, 2012–2019
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fang P, He W, Giordano S, Smith GL. Racial disparities in guideline-concordant cancer care. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99(2 Supplement):S10.
    1. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Goding Sauer A, Newman LA, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):439–448. - PubMed
    1. Sabatino SA, White MC, Thompson TD, Klabunde CN, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cancer screening test use - United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(17):464–468. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ryerson AB, Massetti GM. CDC's public health surveillance of cancer. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017;14:E39-E. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Los Angeles County Health Survey. Los Angeles, CA: County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health; 2015.

Publication types