Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Apr;7(4):e007077.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007077.

Global and regional estimates of maternal near miss: a systematic review, meta-analysis and experiences with application

Tabassum Firoz  1 , Carla Lionela Trigo Romero  2 , Clarus Leung  3 , João Paulo Souza  2 , Özge Tunçalp  4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Global and regional estimates of maternal near miss: a systematic review, meta-analysis and experiences with application

Tabassum Firoz et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Maternal near miss (MNM) is a useful means to examine quality of obstetric care. Since the introduction of the WHO MNM criteria in 2011, it has been tested and validated, and is being used globally. We sought to systematically review all available studies using the WHO MNM criteria to develop global and regional estimates of MNM frequency and examine its application across settings.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review by implementing a comprehensive literature search from 2011 to 2018 in six databases with no language restrictions. The predefined data collection tool included sections on study characteristics, frequency of near-miss cases and study quality. Meta-analysis was performed by regional groupings. Reported adaptations, modifications and remarks about application were extracted.

Results: 7292 articles were screened by title and abstract, and 264 articles were retrieved for full text review for the meta-analysis. An additional 230 articles were screened for experiences with application of the WHO MNM criteria. Sixty studies with near-miss data from 56 countries were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled global near-miss estimate was 1.4% (95% CI 0.4% to 2.5%) with regional variation in MNM frequency. Of the 20 studies that made adaptations to the criteria, 19 were from low-resource settings where lab-based criteria were adapted due to resource limitations.

Conclusions: The WHO MNM criteria have enabled the comparison of global and sub-national estimates of MNM frequency. There has been good uptake in low-resource countries but contextual adaptations are necessary.

Keywords: maternal health; maternal mortality; quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Review and selection of articles.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. UNICEF, UNFPA WHO, et al. . Maternal mortality: levels and trends 2000 to 2017: estimates by who, UNICEF, UNFPA, world bank group and the United nations population division. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019.
    1. Tunçalp Ö, Souza JP. Maternal near-miss audits to improve quality of care. BJOG 2014;121(Suppl 4):102–4. 10.1111/1471-0528.12868 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC, et al. . Maternal near miss--towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care.. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23:287–96. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Say L, Pattinson RC, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality: the prevalence of severe acute maternal morbidity (near miss). Reprod Health 2004;1:3. 10.1186/1742-4755-1-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tunçalp O, Hindin MJ, Souza JP, et al. . The prevalence of maternal near miss: a systematic review. BJOG 2012;119:653–61. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03294.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types