Inequities in Therapy for Infantile Spasms: A Call to Action
- PMID: 35388521
- PMCID: PMC9482145
- DOI: 10.1002/ana.26363
Inequities in Therapy for Infantile Spasms: A Call to Action
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether selection of treatment for children with infantile spasms (IS) varies by race/ethnicity.
Methods: The prospective US National Infantile Spasms Consortium database includes children with IS treated from 2012 to 2018. We examined the relationship between race/ethnicity and receipt of standard IS therapy (prednisolone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, vigabatrin), adjusting for demographic and clinical variables using logistic regression. Our primary outcome was treatment course, which considered therapy prescribed for the first and, when needed, the second IS treatment together.
Results: Of 555 children, 324 (58%) were non-Hispanic white, 55 (10%) non-Hispanic Black, 24 (4%) non-Hispanic Asian, 80 (14%) Hispanic, and 72 (13%) other/unknown. Most (398, 72%) received a standard treatment course. Insurance type, geographic location, history of prematurity, prior seizures, developmental delay or regression, abnormal head circumference, hypsarrhythmia, and IS etiologies were associated with standard therapy. In adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black children had lower odds of receiving a standard treatment course compared with non-Hispanic white children (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.89; p = 0.02). Adjusted models also showed that children with public (vs. private) insurance had lower odds of receiving standard therapy for treatment 1 (OR, 0.42; CI, 0.21-0.84; p = 0.01).
Interpretation: Non-Hispanic Black children were more often treated with non-standard IS therapies than non-Hispanic white children. Likewise, children with public (vs. private) insurance were less likely to receive standard therapies. Investigating drivers of inequities, and understanding the impact of racism on treatment decisions, are critical next steps to improve care for patients with IS. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:32-44.
© 2022 American Neurological Association.
Conflict of interest statement
Potential Conflicts of Interest
The NISC prospective study was supported by the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Foundation and the American Epilepsy Society. FMB receives funding for her research efforts from the NINDS K23NS116110. Unrelated to this study, TL has performed consulting for Lundbeck and Upsher Smith, companies selling vigabatrin, Amzell, a company investigating synthetic hormone treatment, and through BCH TL has conducted investigator-initiated studies funded by Mallinckrodt, a company selling ACTH, and investigator-initiated studies funded by Lundbeck and Upsher Smith, companies selling vigabatrin. Unrelated to this study, TL filed intellectual property related to epilepsy and IS diagnosis.
Figures

References
-
- Begley C, Basu R, Reynolds T, et al. Sociodemographic disparities in epilepsy care: results from the Houston/New York City health care use and outcomes study. Epilepsia 2009;50:1040–1,050. - PubMed
-
- Bautista R, Jain D. Detecting health disparities among Caucasians and African-Americans with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2011;20:52–56. - PubMed
-
- Hamade Y, Palzer E, Helgeson E, et al. Persistent racial and ethnic disparities as a potential source of epilepsy surgery underutilization: analysis of large national datasets from 2006–2016. Epilepsy Res 2021;176:106725. - PubMed