Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;69(3):394-402.
doi: 10.1002/jmrs.580. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

Health preference research: An overview for medical radiation sciences

Affiliations

Health preference research: An overview for medical radiation sciences

Amy Brown et al. J Med Radiat Sci. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Understanding preferences of key stakeholders including patients, clinicians and policymakers can inform clinical practice, workforce and policy. It also allows health services to evaluate existing clinical practices, policies and procedures. This commentary aims to introduce medical radiation professionals to health preference research by describing commonly used preference methodologies, with a particular focus on discrete choice experiments. Relevant examples of health preference research will be highlighted to demonstrate the application of health preference research in medical radiation sciences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hypothetical example of a scenario and choice set used in a discrete choice experiment, developed by the authors to demonstrate a choice set. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Broad stages of completing a discrete choice experiment (DCE), with the green steps highlighting where the MRS practitioner has the potential to take the leading role in a research team and blue steps highlighting where the MRS practitioner can work with a DCE expert/s. †ISPOR: The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Similar articles

References

    1. Woolcock K. 12 Value‐based health care – setting the scene for Australia. Int J Integr Care 2021; 20: 4.
    1. World Economic Forum . Value in healthcare laying the foundation for health system transformation. 2017; (April): 1–40. Available from: www.weforum.org
    1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care . Consumers, the Health System and Health Literacy: Taking Action to Improve Safety and Quality. Consultation Paper. 2013; (June): Sydney: ACSQHC.
    1. Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee . Guidelines for preparing submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Version 4.3. Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Health [Internet]. 2008; (June): 350. Available from: https://pbac.pbs.gov.au/content/information/printable‐files/pbacg‐book.pdf
    1. Viney R, Lancsar E, Louviere J. Discrete choice experiments to measure consumer preferences for health and healthcare. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2002; 2: 319–26. - PubMed