Influence of respiration and tissue contact on ventricular substrate identification during high density mapping: Results from an ovine infarct model
- PMID: 35388937
- DOI: 10.1111/jce.15487
Influence of respiration and tissue contact on ventricular substrate identification during high density mapping: Results from an ovine infarct model
Abstract
Introduction: Multielectrode mapping (MEM) and automated point collection are important enhancements to substrate mapping in ventricular tachycardia ablation. The effects of tissue contact and respiration on electrogram voltage with differing depolarization wavefronts with MEM catheters are unclear.
Methods: Bipolar and unipolar voltages were collected from control (n = 5) and infarcted (n = 7) animals with a multispline MEM catheter. Electro-anatomic maps were created in sinus rhythm, and right and left ventricular pacing. Analysis was performed across three collections: standard settings (SS), respiratory-phase gating (RG), and electrode-tissue proximity (TP). Comparison was made to scar detected by cardiac MRI (cMRI).
Results: Compared to SS and RG acquisition, median bipolar and unipolar voltages were higher using TP, regardless of the depolarization wavefront. In infarct animals, bipolar voltages were 30.7%-50.5% higher for bipolar and 8.7%-13.8% higher on unipolar voltages with TP, compared to SS. The effect of RG on bipolar and unipolar voltages was minimal. Percentage of local abnormal ventricular activities was not impacted by acquisition settings or wavefront direction in infarct animals. Compared with cMRI defined scar, all three acquisition settings overestimated scar area using standard voltage-based cutoffs. RG improved the low voltage area concordance with MRI by 1.6%-5.1% whereas TP improved by 5.9%-8.4%.
Conclusions: High density voltage mapping with a MEM catheter is influenced by point collection settings. Tissue contact filters reduced low voltage areas and improved agreement with cMRI fibrosis in infarcted ovine hearts. These findings have critical implications for optimizing filter settings for high density substrate mapping in the left ventricle.
Keywords: electroanatomic mapping; multielectrode mapping; myocardial scar; ventricular substrate; ventricular tachycardia.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Comment in
-
Characterization of ventricular scar in the era of high-density mapping: When can we believe what we see?J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jul;33(7):1505-1506. doi: 10.1111/jce.15490. Epub 2022 Apr 19. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022. PMID: 35388944 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Josephson ME, Anter E. Substrate mapping for ventricular tachycardia: assumptions and misconceptions. JACC Clin Electrophysiol.2015;1:341-352.
-
- Cronin EM, Bogun FM, Maury P, et al. Group ESCSD HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Europace. 2019;21:1143-1144.
-
- Yamashita S, Cochet H, Sacher F, et al. Impact of new technologies and approaches for post-myocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia ablation during long-term follow-up. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e003901.
-
- Viswanathan K, Mantziari L, Butcher C, et al. Evaluation of a novel high-resolution mapping system for catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:176-183.
-
- Pouliopoulos J, Chik WW, Kanthan A, et al. Intramyocardial adiposity after myocardial infarction: new implications of a substrate for ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2013;128:2296-2308.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
