Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;24(6):1176-1186.
doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

Interventions to improve delivery of cancer genetics services in the United States: A scoping review

Affiliations

Interventions to improve delivery of cancer genetics services in the United States: A scoping review

Erica M Bednar et al. Genet Med. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Interventions that decrease barriers and improve clinical processes can increase patient access to guideline-recommended cancer genetics services. We sought to identify and describe interventions to improve patient receipt of guideline-recommended cancer genetics services in the United States.

Methods: We performed a comprehensive search in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 1, 2000 to February 12, 2020. Eligible articles reported interventions to improve the identification, referral, genetic counseling (GC), and genetic testing (GT) of patients in the United States. We independently screened titles and abstracts and reviewed full-text articles. Data were synthesized by grouping articles by clinical process.

Results: Of 44 included articles, 17 targeted identification of eligible patients, 14 targeted referral, 15 targeted GC, and 16 targeted GT. Patient identification interventions included universal tumor testing and screening of medical/family history. Referral interventions included medical record system adaptations, standardizing processes, and provider notifications. GC interventions included supplemental patient education, integrated GC within oncology clinics, appointment coordination, and alternative service delivery models. One article directly targeted the GT process by implementing provider-coordinated testing.

Conclusion: This scoping review identified and described interventions to improve US patients' access to and receipt of guideline-recommended cancer genetics services.

Keywords: Cancer genetics; Genetic counseling; Genetic testing; Interventions; Scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study inclusion and exclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Process and factors impacting delivery of genetics services.
White circles, policy factors; Gray circles, clinic factors/decisions; Black circles, Patient factors/decisions. GC, genetic counseling; HCP, health care provider.

References

    1. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1458–1465. 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stross JK, Harlan WR. The dissemination of new medical information. JAMA. 1979;241(24):2622–2624. - PubMed
    1. Green LW, Ottoson JM, García C, Hiatt RA. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:151–174. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, and pancreatic. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_bop.pdf; 2020. Accessed December 3, 2020.
    1. Allford A, Qureshi N, Barwell J, Lewis C, Kai J. What hinders minority ethnic access to cancer genetics services and what may help? Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(7):866–874. 10.1038/ejhg.2013.257. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources