Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 9;7(9):e157699.
doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.157699.

Immunogenic epitope panel for accurate detection of non-cross-reactive T cell response to SARS-CoV-2

Affiliations

Immunogenic epitope panel for accurate detection of non-cross-reactive T cell response to SARS-CoV-2

Aleksei Titov et al. JCI Insight. .

Abstract

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic calls for more effective diagnostic tools. T cell response assessment serves as an independent indicator of prior COVID-19 exposure while also contributing to a more comprehensive characterization of SARS-CoV-2 immunity. In this study, we systematically assessed the immunogenicity of 118 epitopes with immune cells collected from multiple cohorts of vaccinated, convalescent, healthy unexposed, and SARS-CoV-2-exposed donors. We identified 75 immunogenic epitopes, 24 of which were immunodominant. We further confirmed HLA restriction for 49 epitopes and described association with more than 1 HLA allele for 14 of these. Exclusion of 2 cross-reactive epitopes that generated a response in prepandemic samples left us with a 73-epitope set that offered excellent diagnostic specificity without losing sensitivity compared with full-length antigens, and this evoked a robust cross-reactive response. We subsequently incorporated this set of epitopes into an in vitro diagnostic Corona-T-test, which achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 95% in a clinical trial. In a cohort of asymptomatic seronegative individuals with a history of prolonged SARS-CoV-2 exposure, we observed a complete absence of T cell response to our epitope panel. In combination with strong reactivity to full-length antigens, this suggests that a cross-reactive response might protect these individuals.

Keywords: Antigen; COVID-19; Clinical Trials; Peptides; T cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflict of interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Characteristics of the peptide set.
(A) Number of epitopes selected from each indicated publication (detailed in Supplemental Table 1) for the MHC-I (left) and -II (right) sets. The distribution of the peptides according to the number of HLA that they bind is shown at top. The x axis displays the number of predicted binding alleles per peptide. The y axis shows the percentage of peptides that bind to a given number of alleles. Numbers below the SARS-CoV-2 genome schematic indicate the number of peptides derived from each gene. (B) The number of HLA class I (left) and -II (middle) alleles alone or in combination (right) that are predicted to bind at least 1 peptide from the set per individual among 2210 donors from the BM registry. (C) Antigen response among the healthy (HD-2019) cohort (n = 52). The normalized mean of 2 duplicate wells and the median and interquartile range. Cross-reactive MHC-II peptides are marked with red arrows. The positive threshold is indicated by the dotted line.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Response to MHC-II peptides differs significantly in Vac and CP donors.
(A) Response to the indicated antigens as measured by ELISpot for Vac (n = 43) and CP (n = 51). A normalized mean of 2 duplicate wells and a median with interquartile range. Mann-Whitney U test (S peptides, P = 0.013; MHC-II peptides, recombinant S protein, P < 0.0001). (B) Volcano plot shows the effect of a particular HLA allele on response to the same peptide sets and antigens. The x axis denotes the decimal logarithm of the ratio of the median response among HLA carriers to that of individuals without the HLA. The y axis denotes the negative decimal logarithm of the P value. The 3 most significant associations are annotated. P = 0.05 is depicted by the dotted line (Fisher’s exact test). (CE) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for MHC I + II peptides versus S peptides in Vac versus HD-2019 samples (C); MHC I + II peptides versus S, N, or M peptides in CP versus HD-2019 samples (D); and MHC I + II peptides versus the sum of S, N, and M peptides and versus multiple regression model, incorporating S, N, and M peptides in CP versus HD-2019 samples (E). Three HD-2019 donors with cross-reactive responses were excluded from the ROC analysis for MHC I + II peptides.
Figure 3
Figure 3. T cell response to MHC-I and MHC-II epitopes in CP and Vac.
(A and B) Immunogenicity in carriers of various HLA-I (A) or HLA-II (B) alleles. For the right sides of the plots, gray bars indicate the number of tested carriers; colored bars indicate the number of responses. Colors indicate source protein, with 3-letter amino acid codes at left. Superscript numbers indicate peptide length, and the asterisk denotes a peptide with an ambiguous HLA association. The left sides of the plots show the number of responses in donors without the indicated HLA. For HLA-I, the association between the response and a single HLA allele is shown; for HLA-II, the best associations (including associations with several HLAs) are shown. Fisher’s exact test; P < 0.05 were considered significant (exact P values are specified in Supplemental Table 3). (C) Number of S protein–derived MHC-I and MHC-II epitopes recognized per individual for the CP and Vac cohorts; median and interquartile range are shown
Figure 4
Figure 4. Clinical trial confirmed the high accuracy of the Corona-T-test in discriminating healthy donors from vaccinated and convalescents.
(A) Scatter plot shows Corona-T-test result. A normalized mean of 2 duplicate wells for the Vac_trial (n = 69) and CP_trial (n = 50) and HD-2021 (n = 95) cohort with median and interquartile range. Results in the gray zone (n = 6) were excluded from the ROC-analysis. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s post hoc test; ****P < 0.0001. (B) ROC curve for Vac_trial (AUC = 0.98) an CP_trial (AUC = 0.97) versus HD-2021_trial. (C and D) Number of confirmed HLA-I and -II alleles per individual binding at least 1 peptide from any protein (C) or S protein (D) (n = 2210).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Evidence for a cross-reactive rather than SARS-CoV-2–specific response in the healthy exposed (HE) cohort.
(A) Response to the antigens (normalized mean of 2 wells after subtracting negative control) in HE (n = 37), CP (n = 51), and HD-2019 (n = 52) cohorts. Each bar represents an individual donor; colors represent particular antigens. (B) Comparison of the response to antigens between cohorts as measured with ELISpot. A normalized mean of 2 duplicate well, and the median response and interquartile range. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s post hoc test; ****P < 0.0001, **P < 0.01. (C) Difference in responses to MHC-II peptides before and after exclusion of 2 cross-reactive peptides in the HE cohort (Wilcoxon test; P = 0.0045).**P < 0.01.

References

    1. Jain R, et al. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among potential convalescent plasma donors and analysis of their deferral pattern: Experience from tertiary care hospital in western India. Transfus Clin Biol. 2022;29(1):60–64. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2021.07.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wajnberg A, et al. Robust neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection persist for months. Science. 2020;370(6521):1227–1230. doi: 10.1126/science.abd7728. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gudbjartsson DF, et al. Humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(18):1724–1734. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026116. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braun J, et al. SARS-CoV-2–reactive T cells in healthy donors and patients with COVID-19. Nature. 2020;587(7833):270–274. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2598-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grifoni A, et al. Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals. Cell. 2020;181(7):1489–1501. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances