Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0263990.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263990. eCollection 2022.

Interpersonal responses to facial expressions of disgust, anger, and happiness in individuals with varying levels of social anxiety

Affiliations

Interpersonal responses to facial expressions of disgust, anger, and happiness in individuals with varying levels of social anxiety

Marije Aan Het Rot et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background and objectives: Facial expression recognition has been studied extensively, including in relation to social anxiety. Nonetheless, a limited number of studies examined recognition of disgust expressions. Results suggest that disgust is perceived as more threatening than anger, and thus may invite more extreme responses. However, few studies have examined responses to facial expressions. These studies have focused on approach-avoidance responses. Our primary aim was to examine to what extent anger and disgust expressions might invite interpersonal responses in terms of quarrelsomeness-agreeableness and dominance-submissiveness. As social anxiety has been previously associated with a heightened sensitivity to anger and disgust expressions, as well as with alterations in quarrelsomeness-agreeableness and dominance-submissiveness, our secondary aim was to examine whether social anxiety would moderate these responses.

Methods: Participants were 55 women and 43 men who completed social anxiety measures, including the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation scale, and two tasks that involved "targets" expressing anger, disgust, or happiness at 0%, 50%, or 100%. Participants first indicated how quarrelsome or agreeable and how dominant or submissive they would be towards each target, and then how much they would avoid or approach each target.

Results: While 100% disgust and anger expressions invited similar levels of quarrelsomeness and avoidance, 50% disgust invited more quarrelsomeness and stronger avoidance than 50% anger. While these patterns were not meaningfully moderated by social anxiety, individuals with higher BFNE scores showed a relatively strong approach of happy faces.

Limitations: Actual interpersonal behaviour in response to facial expressions was not assessed.

Conclusions: Findings support the relevance of disgust as an interpersonal signal and suggest that, especially at mild intensity, disgust may have a stronger impact than anger on people's quarrelsomeness and avoidance responses. Findings provided no support for the view that people with social anxiety would be particularly responsive to disgust (or anger) expressions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Responses to 50% and 100% angry, disgusted, and happy facial expressions in terms of quarrelsomeness-agreeableness and submissiveness-dominance.
Quarrelsomeness-agreeableness represents communion (horizontal dimension) and submissiveness-dominance represents agency (vertical dimension). Horizontal and vertical error bars have been omitted for clarity.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Responses to 50% and 100% angry, disgusted, and happy facial expressions in terms of approach-avoidance.
Error bars represent standard errors. ***p < 0.001.

References

    1. aan het Rot M, Hogenelst K, Gesing CM. Communal and agentic behaviour in response to facial emotion expressions. Br J Psychol. 2014;105(2):173–86. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12029 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seidel E-M, Habel U, Kirschner M, Gur RC, Derntl B. The impact of facial emotional expressions on behavioral tendencies in women and men. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010;36(2):500–7. doi: 10.1037/a0018169 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oaten M, Stevenson RJ, Case TI. Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychol Bull. 2009;135(2):303–21. Epub 2009/03/04. doi: 10.1037/a0014823 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tybur JM, Lieberman D, Griskevicius V. Microbes, mating, and morality: individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;97(1):103–22. Epub 2009/07/10. doi: 10.1037/a0015474 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rachman S, Radomsky AS, Elliott CM, Zysk E. Mental contamination: the perpetrator effect. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2012;43(1):587–93. Epub 2011/09/06. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.08.002 . - DOI - PubMed