Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266666.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266666. eCollection 2022.

Estimating the differences in Caesarean section (C-section) rates between public and privately insured mothers in Florida: A decomposition approach

Neeraj Puro  1 , Reena J Kelly  2 , Mandar Bodas  3 , Scott Feyereisen  1
Affiliations

Estimating the differences in Caesarean section (C-section) rates between public and privately insured mothers in Florida: A decomposition approach

Neeraj Puro et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Caesarean section (C-sections) is a medically critical and often life-saving procedure for prevention of childbirth complications. However, there are reports of its overuse, especially in women covered by private insurance as compared to public insurance. This study evaluates the difference in C-Section rates among nulliparous women in Florida hospitals across insurance groups and quantifies the contribution of maternal and hospital factors in explaining the difference in rates.

Methods: We used Florida's inpatient data provided by the Florida Agency for HealthCare Administration (FLAHCA) and focused on low-risk births that occurred between January 1, 2010, and September 30, 2015. A Fairlie decomposition method was performed on cross-sectional data to decompose the difference in C-Section rates between insurance groups into the proportion explained versus unexplained by the differences in observable maternal and hospital factors.

Results: Of the 386,612 NTSV low-risk births, 72,984 were delivered via C-Section (18.87%). Higher prevalence of C-section at maternal level was associated with diabetes, hypertension, and the expectant mother being over 35 years old. Higher prevalence of C-section at the hospital level was associated with lower occupancy rate, presence of neonatal ICU (NICU) unit and higher obstetrics care level in the hospital. Private insurance coverage in expectant mothers is associated with C-section rates that were 4.4 percentage points higher as compared to that of public insurance. Just over 33.7% of the 4.4 percentage point difference in C-section rates between the two insurance groups can be accounted for by maternal and hospital factors.

Conclusions: The study identifies that the prevalence of C-sections in expectant mothers covered by private insurance is higher compared to mothers covered by public insurance. Although, majority of the difference in C-Section rates across insurance groups remains unexplained (around 66.3%), the main contributor that explains the other 33.7% is advancing maternal age and socioeconomic status of the expectant mother. Further investigation to explore additional factors that explain the difference needs to be done if United States wants to target specific policies to lower overall C-Section rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow chart for selecting the analytical sample (N = 386,612).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJ, Barros FC, Juan L, et al.. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al.. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reproductive health. 2015;12(1):57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Connection C. Comparing risks of cesarean and vaginal birth to mothers, babies, and future reproductive capacity: A systematic review. New York: Childbirth Connection, April. 2004.
    1. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, Easterling TR. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. Jama. 2000;283(18):2411–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.18.2411 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang T, Sidorchuk A, Sevilla-Cermeño L, Vilaplana-Pérez A, Chang Z, Larsson H, et al.. Association of cesarean delivery with risk of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in the offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA network open. 2019;2(8):e1910236–e. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10236 - DOI - PMC - PubMed