Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 1;100(5):skac112.
doi: 10.1093/jas/skac112.

A risk-oriented evaluation of biofilm and other influencing factors on biological quality of drinking water for dairy cows

Affiliations

A risk-oriented evaluation of biofilm and other influencing factors on biological quality of drinking water for dairy cows

Jason J Hayer et al. J Anim Sci. .

Abstract

Despite the importance of livestock drinking water quality on animal physiology, welfare, and performance, influences such as biofilm formation on trough surfaces on microbial water quality are rarely researched. The objective of this study was to assess the microbial quality of water offered to lactating dairy cows and identify risk factors for poor water quality. We further aimed to determine the impact of biofilm formation on water quality and evaluate rapid test systems to score the hygiene status of dairy troughs on the farm. A total of 105 troughs located on 24 typical Western German dairy farms were sampled. Samples of livestock drinking water and biofilm were analyzed for aerobic total viable count (TVC), coliform count (CC), Escherichia coli, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and other bacteria resistant to 3rd generation cephalosporins (CRB). Surface protein- and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-rapid tests were evaluated to detect biofilm formation. The influence of 22 selected fixed and variable trough characteristics on impaired livestock drinking water quality was evaluated by calculating odds ratios. The average TVC, CC, and E. coli counts were 4.4 ± 0.06 (mean ± SD), 1.7 ± 0.1, and 0.6 ± 0.1 log10 cfu per mL, respectively. CC was detectable in 94.3% of all water samples and E. coli in 48.6%. MRSA was found in pooled livestock drinking water samples of a single farm and CRB on three farms, suggesting that troughs might function as a reservoir of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, thereby contributing to an exchange of antibiotic-resistant bacteria between animals. Risk factors for the impairment of at least one microbial quality criteria (TVC, CC, or E. coli) increased significantly (P < 0.05) when using high-volume troughs, other trough materials than stainless steel, a lower distance to the milking parlor, heavy visible soiling, biofilm formation, and high ambient and high water temperatures. CC (r = 0.46; P < 0.001) and E. coli (r = 0.31; P < 0.01) of water samples correlated with their equivalent in biofilm and with the results of rapid tests on trough surfaces (0.31 > r > 0.19; P < 0.05). Addressing the identified risk factors could be an approach to ensure sufficient biological quality of livestock drinking water.

Keywords: antibiotic-resistant bacteria; hygiene; rapid tests; risk assessment; water contamination; water troughs.

Plain language summary

Although water is recognized as one of the most important nutrients for dairy cows, only limited research on its quality and potential risk factors for quality impairments is available. This study aimed to evaluate biological water quality on Western German dairy farms, identify potential risk factors for impairment, and evaluate rapid test systems to score the hygienic status of troughs. Water, biofilm, and trough surfaces of 105 water troughs on 24 dairy farms were sampled and analyzed. The bacterial load of sampled livestock drinking water was relatively high. Nearly half of all water samples were contaminated with Escherichia coli, and antibiotic-resistant bacteria were detectable on four farms. Identified risk factors for poor biological water quality that could be used to ensure sufficient water quality on-farm were: high-volume troughs, plastic or cast iron as trough material, a lower distance to the milking parlor, heavy visible soiling, biofilm formation, and high ambient and high water temperatures. Rapid test systems to evaluate trough surfaces correlated with biofilm and water analysis results and could be a useful tool for farmers to check water quality on-farm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Different trough systems used on Western German dairy farms, categorized regarding trough design in tank troughs (open troughs with constant volume; A, B), tip tanks (open troughs with constant volume and tipping mechanism; C, D), and valve troughs (open troughs initiated by pressure; E, F); trough material in stainless steel (D, E), plastic (A, B, C), and cast iron (F); trough volume in volumes <5 L (F), volumes of 5 to 49 L (C, E), volumes of 50 to 119 L (D), volumes of >119 L (A, B).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Spearman’s rank correlations (P < 0.05) between total viable count, total coliform count, and Escherichia coli count of livestock drinking water (n = 105) and biofilm on troughs surface (n = 72), and rapid hygiene tests on the trough surface.

References

    1. Adetunji, V. O., Kehinde A. O., Bolatito O. K., and Chen J.. . 2014. Biofilm formation by Mycobacterium bovis: influence of surface kind and temperatures of sanitizer treatments on biofilm control. Biomed Res. Int. 2014:210165. doi:10.1155/2014/210165 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balcázar, J. L., Subirats J., and Borrego C. M.. . 2015. The role of biofilms as environmental reservoirs of antibiotic resistance. Front. Microbiol. 6:1216. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01216 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barry, J., Bokkers E. A. M., Berry D. P., de Boer I. J. M., McClure J., and Kennedy E.. . 2019. Associations between colostrum management, passive immunity, calf-related hygiene practices, and rates of mortality in preweaning dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 102:10266–10276. doi:10.3168/jds.2019-16815 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beede, D. K. 2012. What will our ruminants drink? Anim. Front 2:36–43. doi:10.2527/af.2012-0040 - DOI
    1. BMEL (Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture). 2019. Hygienische Qualität von Tränkwasser - Orientierungsrahmen zur futtermittelrechtlichen Beurteilung. [accessed March 15, 2022]. https://www.bmel.de/DE/themen/tiere/futtermittel/orientierungsrahmen-tra....