Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep;112(3):461-484.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.2605. Epub 2022 May 24.

Regulation of Drug Transport Proteins-From Mechanisms to Clinical Impact: A White Paper on Behalf of the International Transporter Consortium

Affiliations
Review

Regulation of Drug Transport Proteins-From Mechanisms to Clinical Impact: A White Paper on Behalf of the International Transporter Consortium

Kim L R Brouwer et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Membrane transport proteins are involved in the absorption, disposition, efficacy, and/or toxicity of many drugs. Numerous mechanisms (e.g., nuclear receptors, epigenetic gene regulation, microRNAs, alternative splicing, post-translational modifications, and trafficking) regulate transport protein levels, localization, and function. Various factors associated with disease, medications, and dietary constituents, for example, may alter the regulation and activity of transport proteins in the intestine, liver, kidneys, brain, lungs, placenta, and other important sites, such as tumor tissue. This white paper reviews key mechanisms and regulatory factors that alter the function of clinically relevant transport proteins involved in drug disposition. Current considerations with in vitro and in vivo models that are used to investigate transporter regulation are discussed, including strengths, limitations, and the inherent challenges in predicting the impact of changes due to regulation of one transporter on compensatory pathways and overall drug disposition. In addition, translation and scaling of in vitro observations to in vivo outcomes are considered. The importance of incorporating altered transporter regulation in modeling and simulation approaches to predict the clinical impact on drug disposition is also discussed. Regulation of transporters is highly complex and, therefore, identification of knowledge gaps will aid in directing future research to expand our understanding of clinically relevant molecular mechanisms of transporter regulation. This information is critical to the development of tools and approaches to improve therapeutic outcomes by predicting more accurately the impact of regulation-mediated changes in transporter function on drug disposition and response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

K.L.R.B. is co‐inventor of the sandwich‐cultured hepatocyte technology for quantification of biliary excretion (B‐CLEAR) and related technologies, which have been licensed exclusively to Qualyst Transporter Solutions, acquired by BioIVT. R.E. is an employee of Johnson & Johnson and may own stock or stock options of Johnson & Johnson. C.Y.L. is an employee of Amgen and may be a stockholder of Amgen. S.N. is an employee of Certara UK Ltd. and stockholder of Certara. S.H.S. is an employee of AstraZeneca and holds AstraZeneca stock. All other authors declared no competing interests for this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mechanisms of transporter regulation. (a) Nuclear receptors (NRs) bind ligands and attach to specific DNA sequences, often dimerized with another NR, to initiate transcription. (b) DNA methylation can decrease gene expression by disturbing the binding of transcription factors or co‐activators. Histone acetylation can unfold chromatin leading to a decrease in the binding affinity between histones and DNA, thereby resulting in an increase in gene expression. (c) microRNAs (miRNAs) are small non‐coding RNAs that can suppress (or potentially activate) translation by binding to 3′‐UTR regions of mRNA or initiate mRNA degradation through perfect complementarity with the mRNA. (d) With alternative splicing, multiple mRNAs can be produced from one gene, which can then result in different proteins. In humans, exon skipping is the most common form of alternative splicing. ORF, open reading frame; UTR, untranslated region.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The turnover model as applied to drug‐drug interactions. The dynamics of transporter regulation via induction/suppression is represented by a turnover model in which the amount of transporter at equilibrium reflects the balance between its rate of synthesis and its rate of degradation, defined by a first‐order rate constant (kdeg). The required perpetrator data are either: (1) maximum fold induction/suppression over vehicle control (Indmax; Indmax < 1 indicates suppression, Indmax > 1 indicates induction); (2) The slope of the fold induction/suppression versus transporter inhibitor concentration ([I]t) plot when induction/suppression is linear within the range of perpetrator concentrations (Indslope in µM−1); or (3) perpetrator concentration that supports half‐maximal induction/suppression (IndC50 in µM) together with Indslope. This option will link the perpetrator concentration over a range of concentrations directly to induction/suppression and hence will best translate to changes in protein levels. For the IndC50 determination, the fraction of unbound drug in the in vitro incubation (fu inc) also should be considered. Required system data (population information) are: baseline protein level (T0) and kdeg. Tt is the state variable describing the relative change in the transporter level with respect to baseline because of induction/suppression. Without induction/suppression Tt = 1.

Comment in

References

    1. Giacomini, K.M. et al. Membrane transporters in drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 215–236 (2010). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zamek‐Gliszczynski, M.J. et al. Transporters in drug development: 2018 ITC recommendations for transporters of emerging clinical importance. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 104, 890–899 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keogh, J. , Hagenbuch, B. , Rynn, C. , Stieger, B. & Nicholls, G. Chapter 1. Membrane transporters: fundamentals, function and their role in ADME. In Drug Transporters: Role and Importance in ADME and Drug Development Vol. 1, 1–56 (The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2016).
    1. Wakabayashi, Y. , Kipp, H. & Arias, I.M. Transporters on demand: intracellular reservoirs and cycling of bile canalicular ABC transporters. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 27669–27673 (2006). - PubMed
    1. Evers, R. et al. Disease‐associated changes in drug transporters may impact the pharmacokinetics and/or toxicity of drugs: a white paper from the International Transporter Consortium. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 104, 900–915 (2018). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances