Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Apr 9;399(10333):1401-1410.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00455-X. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

Long-term efficacy and safety of renal denervation in the presence of antihypertensive drugs (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED): a randomised, sham-controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long-term efficacy and safety of renal denervation in the presence of antihypertensive drugs (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED): a randomised, sham-controlled trial

Felix Mahfoud et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: Renal denervation has been shown to lower blood pressure in the presence of antihypertensive medications; however, long-term safety and efficacy data from randomised trials of renal denervation are lacking. In this pre-specified analysis of the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study, we compared changes in blood pressure, antihypertensive drug use, and safety up to 36 months in renal denervation versus a sham control group.

Methods: This randomised, single-blind, sham-controlled trial enrolled patients from 25 clinical centres in the USA, Germany, Japan, the UK, Australia, Austria, and Greece, with uncontrolled hypertension and office systolic blood pressure between 150 mm Hg and 180 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher. Eligible patients had to have 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure between 140 mm Hg and less than 170 mm Hg, while taking one to three antihypertensive drugs with stable doses for at least 6 weeks. Patients underwent renal angiography and were randomly assigned (1:1) to radiofrequency renal denervation or a sham control procedure. Patients and physicians were unmasked after 12-month follow-up and sham control patients could cross over after 12-month follow-up completion. The primary endpoint was the treatment difference in mean 24-h systolic blood pressure at 6 months between the renal denervation group and the sham control group. Statistical analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population. Long-term efficacy was assessed using ambulatory and office blood pressure measurements up to 36 months. Drug surveillance was used to assess medication use. Safety events were assessed up to 36 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02439775; prospectively, an additional 260 patients are currently being randomly assigned as part of the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Expansion trial.

Findings: Between July 22, 2015, and June 14, 2017, among 467 enrolled patients, 80 patients fulfilled the qualifying criteria and were randomly assigned to undergo renal denervation (n=38) or a sham control procedure (n=42). Mean ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly reduced from baseline in the renal denervation group, and were significantly lower than the sham control group at 24 and 36 months, despite a similar treatment intensity of antihypertensive drugs. The medication burden at 36 months was 2·13 medications (SD 1·15) in the renal denervation group and 2·55 medications (2·19) in the sham control group (p=0·26). 24 (77%) of 31 patients in the renal denervation group and 25 (93%) of 27 patients in the sham control group adhered to medication at 36 months. At 36 months, the ambulatory systolic blood pressure reduction was -18·7 mm Hg (SD 12·4) for the renal denervation group (n=30) and -8·6 mm Hg (14·6) for the sham control group (n=32; adjusted treatment difference -10·0 mm Hg, 95% CI -16·6 to -3·3; p=0·0039). Treatment differences between the renal denervation group and sham control group at 36 months were -5·9 mm Hg (95% CI -10·1 to -1·8; p=0·0055) for mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, -11·0 mm Hg (-19·8 to -2·1; p=0·016) for morning systolic blood pressure, and -11·8 mm Hg (-19·0 to -4·7; p=0·0017) for night-time systolic blood pressure. There were no short-term or long-term safety issues associated with renal denervation.

Interpretation: Radiofrequency renal denervation compared with sham control produced a clinically meaningful and lasting blood pressure reduction up to 36 months of follow-up, independent of concomitant antihypertensive medications and without major safety events. Renal denervation could provide an adjunctive treatment modality in the management of patients with hypertension.

Funding: Medtronic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests FM is supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR219), and Deutsche Herzstiftung, and has received scientific support and/or speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, and ReCor Medical. DEK reports institutional research or grant support from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Orbus Neich, Teleflex, Medtronic, and Ablative Solutions, and personal consulting honoraria from Ablative Solutions, Cardiovascular Systems, Magenta Medical, Medtronic, and Terumo. KK received personal fees from Medtronic, during the conduct of the study, grants from Teijin Pharma, Omron Healthcare, Fukuda Denshi, Bayer Yakuhin, A&D Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Mochida Pharmaceutical, EA Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Tanabe Mitsubishi Pharma Corporation, Novartis Pharma, Shionogi & Co, Terumo Corporation, MSD, and Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Omron Healthcare, Bayer Yakuhin, Mochida Pharmaceutical, and Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, outside the submitted work. RRT is a consultant for Medtronic, Axio, and Janssen. MAW is a consultant for Medtronic, ReCor Medical, Ablative Solutions, Johnson & Johnson, and Urovant. RES reports grants and personal fees from Medtronic, ReCor Medical, and Ablative Solutions. KT receives payments from Medtronic for work as centre principal investigator. SP reports personal fees from Medtronic, outside the submitted work. KD receives payments from Medtronic for work as centre co-investigator. JWC reports consulting fees from Medtronic, outside the submitted work. CE receives research support from Medtronic. ASPS reports personal fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and ReCor Medical, outside the submitted work. SE reports personal fees from Medtronic, ReCor Medical, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Akcea Therapeutics, and Pfizer, all outside the submitted work. AW receives personal fees from Medtronic for advisory board participation outside the submitted work. IH receives fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and Vifor, outside the submitted work. SB, PM, and MF are all employees of Medtronic. MB is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation; TRR219, project number 322900939) and reports personal fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, ReCor Medical, Servier, and Vifor during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Comment in

Publication types

Substances

Associated data