Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 1;17(3):334-346.
doi: 10.26603/001c.33151. eCollection 2022.

Effect of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Baris B Koc  1 , Alexander Truyens  1 , Marion J L F Heymans  2 , Edwin J P Jansen  1 , Martijn G M Schotanus  3
Affiliations

Effect of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Baris B Koc et al. Int J Sports Phys Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Quadriceps strength and mass deficits are common after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Postoperatively, heavy load resistance training can have detrimental effects on knee joint pain and ACL graft laxity. Therefore, low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) training has been suggested as an alternative to traditional strength rehabilitation.

Purpose: The present systematic review aimed to investigate the effect of LL-BFR training on quadriceps strength, quadriceps mass, knee joint pain, and ACL graft laxity after ACL reconstruction compared to non-BFR training.

Study design: Systematic review.

Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE.com, Cochrane Library/Wiley, CINAHL/Ebsco and Web of Science/Clarivate Analytics was performed on 19 February 2021. Studies were included if they compared LL-BFR and non-BFR training after ACL reconstruction with pre- and post-intervention quadriceps strength, quadriceps mass, knee joint pain or ACL graft laxity measurement. Systematic reviews, editorials, case reports and studies not published in a scientific peer reviewed journal were excluded. The risk of bias of randomized studies was assessed with the use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

Results: A total of six randomized controlled trials were included. Random sequence generation and allocation concealment was defined as high risk in two of the six studies. In all studies blinding of participants and personnel was unclear or could not be performed. The included studies used different LL-BFR and non-BFR protocols with heterogeneous outcome measurements. Therefore, a qualitative analysis was performed. Two of the six studies assessed quadriceps strength and demonstrated significant greater quadriceps strength after LL-BFR compared to non-BFR training. Quadriceps mass was evaluated in four studies. Two studies observed significant greater quadriceps mass after LL-BFR compared to non-BFR training, while two studies observed no significant difference in quadriceps mass. Knee joint pain was assessed in three studies with significantly less knee joint pain after LL-BFR compared to non-BFR training. Two studies evaluated ACL graft laxity and observed no significant difference in ACL graft laxity between LL-BFR and non-BFR training.

Conclusion: The results of this systematic review indicate that LL-BFR training after ACL reconstruction may be beneficial on quadriceps strength, quadriceps mass, and knee joint pain compared to non-BFR training with non-detrimental effects on ACL graft laxity. However, more randomized controlled trials with standardized intervention protocols and outcome measurements are needed to add evidence on the clinical value of LL-BFR training.

Level of evidence: 2a.

Keywords: graft laxity; knee pain; postoperative rehabilitation; quadriceps mass; quadriceps strength; resistance training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow chart of the literature search and selection procedure.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias domain with the use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ithurburn Matthew P., Altenburger Alex R., Thomas Staci, Hewett Timothy E., Paterno Mark V., Schmitt Laura C. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2. Vol. 26. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; Young athletes after ACL reconstruction with quadriceps strength asymmetry at the time of return-to-sport demonstrate decreased knee function 1 year later; pp. 426–433. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Factors predicting quadriceps femoris muscle atrophy during the first 12 weeks following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Grapar Žargi T., Drobnič Matej, Vauhnik Renata, Koder Jadran, Kacin Alan. Mar;2017 The Knee. 24(2):319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.11.003. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.11.003. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Piussi Ramana, Broman Daniel, Musslinder Erik, Beischer Susanne, Thomeé Roland, Hamrin Senorski Eric. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1. Vol. 12. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; Recovery of preoperative absolute knee extension and flexion strength after ACL reconstruction; pp. 77–84. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quadriceps and hamstring strength symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study. Harput G., Tunay V.B., Ithurburn M. 2020J Sports Rehabil. 30:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Quadriceps muscle size following ACL injury and reconstruction: a systematic review. Birchmeier Thomas, Lisee Caroline, Kane Kevin, Brazier Brett, Triplett Ashley, Kuenze Christopher. 2020Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 38(3):598–608. doi: 10.1002/jor.24489. doi: 10.1002/jor.24489. - DOI - DOI - PubMed