Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 5;82(4):400-409.
doi: 10.1055/a-1515-2622. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Aspects of Pelvic Floor Protection in Spontaneous Delivery - a Review

Affiliations

Aspects of Pelvic Floor Protection in Spontaneous Delivery - a Review

Markus Hübner et al. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. .

Abstract

The necessity of increasingly addressing aspects of pelvic floor protection, i.e., prevention of the most frequent female pelvic floor disorders, such as urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, is the result of the steadily improving understanding of the association of pregnancy and delivery with the prevalence of these disorders. About a quarter of all women experience one or more such symptoms during their life. Apart from age and weight, pregnancies and births play an important part. While initial discussion of pelvic floor protection often focused very rapidly on the mode of delivery and elective caesarean section as a possible protective intervention, it has become apparent in the last few decades how varied and wide-ranging the options are that can be used to protect against pelvic floor disorders. The mode of delivery as such is "only" one element among numerous other considerations and has diminished markedly in importance. Interprofessionality and interdisciplinarity undoubtedly represent an important development as resulting recommendations must always be incorporated in an overall context that considers mother and child at the same time. Considering the pelvic floor only certainly does not make sense. This review article will analyze in greater detail important pre-, intra- and postpartum aspects that in their entirety can provide insight into the various aspects of pelvic floor protection. The authors regard the following article as an additional basis for discussion on achieving a sustained reduction in the incidence and prevalence of female pelvic floor disorders.

Keywords: faecal incontinence; pelvic floor protection; pelvic floor rehabilitation; pelvic organ prolapse; pregnancy; urinary incontinence; vaginal delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest/Interessenkonflikt Markus Hübner: PROMEDON GmbH consultant, Aesculap AG consultant. The other authors declare that there is no conflict of interest./Markus Hübner: PROMEDON GmbH Consultant, Aesculap AG Consultant. Die anderen Autor*innen erklären, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The lowest and highest urinary incontinence rates in the course of pregnancy and post partum described in the studies are shown.
Abb. 1
Abb. 1
Angegeben sind die in den Studien beschriebenen jeweils geringsten und höchsten Harninkontinenzraten im Verlauf der Schwangerschaft und postpartal.

References

    1. Handa V L, Harris T A, Ostergard D R. Protecting the pelvic floor: obstetric management to prevent incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:470–478. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00151-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jelovsek J E, Chagin K, Gyhagen M. Predicting risk of pelvic floor disorders 12 and 20 years after delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:2220–2.22E21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Delancey J O, Kane Low L, Miller J M. Graphic integration of causal factors of pelvic floor disorders: an integrated life span model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:6100–6.1E7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huebner M, Brucker S Y, Tunn R. Intrapartal pelvic floor protection: a pragmatic and interdisciplinary approach between obstetrics and urogynecology. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:795–798. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4316-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angelescu K.Inanspruchnahme von Leistungen der Hebammenhilfe durch GEK-versicherte Schwangere 2008 bis 2009. Eine explorative Analyse von Routinedaten einer gesetzlichen Krankenkasse. Universität Bremen 2012Accessed November 15, 2020 at:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:46-00102787-10