Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 4;14(4):e23804.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.23804. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Advances in Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers

Affiliations
Review

Advances in Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers

Kengo Nishimura et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is increasingly a major cause of disability across the globe. The current methods of diagnosis are inadequate at classifying patients and prognosis. TBI is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. There is no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for TBI yet. It took about 16 years of preclinical research to develop accurate and objective diagnostic measures for TBI. Two brain-specific protein biomarkers, namely, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein, have been extensively characterized. Recently, the two biomarkers were approved by the FDA as the first blood-based biomarker, Brain Trauma Indicator™ (BTI™), via the Breakthrough Devices Program. This scoping review presents (i) TBI diagnosis challenges, (ii) the process behind the FDA approval of biomarkers, and (iii) known unknowns in TBI biomarker biology. The current lag in TBI incidence and hospitalization can be reduced if digital biomarkers such as hard fall detection are standardized and used as a mechanism to alert paramedics to an unresponsive trauma patient.

Keywords: brain trauma indicator; gfap; neurologic prognosis; prognostic biomarkers; serum biomarkers; traumatic brain injury; uchl-1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Gajavelli S is an employee of Lacerta Therapeutics, a company developing viral vector-based gene therapies for central nervous system disorders.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Specific biomarker types and their spatiotemporal distribution.
TBI-specific biomarker types and their spatiotemporal distribution. The prevalence of a biomarker in a healthy population (blue) shifts following injury (red thunderbolt) to a new distribution (red) above the baseline (dashed horizontal line) that is not present in 99 percentiles of the uninjured (specific to injury). Such a biomarker can peak acutely (first rectangle), function as a diagnostic biomarker, and in absence of therapy fuel a cascade of secondary injury over days and months (next to rectangles). The subsequent subacute and chronic biomarkers (yellow and brown, respectively) could serve as monitoring/therapeutic response biomarkers. Failure of therapeutic effect can be assessed by increased safety biomarker. These analog biomarkers (black outline) can be augmented with digital biomarkers (black rectangle) to detect injury and alter, especially when an individual is alone and unresponsive following TBI. It is important to reinforce that any biomarker data should be interpreted only in the context of pertinent clinical history. TBI: traumatic brain injury

References

    1. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, et al. J Neurosurg. 2018:1–18. - PubMed
    1. Early levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light protein in predicting the outcome of mild traumatic brain injury. Hossain I, Mohammadian M, Takala RS, et al. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36:1551–1560. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. Returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan: assessment of readjustment needs of veterans, service members, and their families. - PubMed
    1. Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Menon DK, Schwab K, Wright DW, Maas AI. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1637–1640. - PubMed
    1. Using a cost-benefit analysis to estimate outcomes of a clinical treatment guideline: testing the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. Faul M, Wald MM, Rutland-Brown W, Sullivent EE, Sattin RW. J Trauma. 2007;63:1271–1278. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources