Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 22:12:768639.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.768639. eCollection 2021.

Zone-MPC Automated Insulin Delivery Algorithm Tuned for Pregnancy Complicated by Type 1 Diabetes

Affiliations

Zone-MPC Automated Insulin Delivery Algorithm Tuned for Pregnancy Complicated by Type 1 Diabetes

Basak Ozaslan et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) increases the risk for pregnancy complications. Increased time in the pregnancy glucose target range (63-140 mg/dL as suggested by clinical guidelines) is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes that underscores the need for tight glycemic control. While closed-loop control is highly effective in regulating blood glucose levels in individuals with T1D, its use during pregnancy requires adjustments to meet the tight glycemic control and changing insulin requirements with advancing gestation. In this paper, we tailor a zone model predictive controller (zone-MPC), an optimization-based control strategy that uses model predictions, for use during pregnancy and verify its robustness in-silico through a broad range of scenarios. We customize the existing zone-MPC to satisfy pregnancy-specific glucose control objectives by having (i) lower target glycemic zones (i.e., 80-110 mg/dL daytime and 80-100 mg/dL overnight), (ii) more assertive correction bolus for hyperglycemia, and (iii) a control strategy that results in more aggressive postprandial insulin delivery to keep glucose within the target zone. The emphasis is on leveraging the flexible design of zone-MPC to obtain a controller that satisfies glycemic outcomes recommended for pregnancy based on clinical insight. To verify this pregnancy-specific zone-MPC design, we use the UVA/Padova simulator and conduct in-silico experiments on 10 subjects over 13 scenarios ranging from scenarios with ideal metabolic and treatment parameters for pregnancy to extreme scenarios with such parameters that are highly deviant from the ideal. All scenarios had three meals per day and each meal had 40 grams of carbohydrates. Across 13 scenarios, pregnancy-specific zone-MPC led to a 10.3 ± 5.3% increase in the time in pregnancy target range (baseline zone-MPC: 70.6 ± 15.0%, pregnancy-specific zone-MPC: 80.8 ± 11.3%, p < 0.001) and a 10.7 ± 4.8% reduction in the time above the target range (baseline zone-MPC: 29.0 ± 15.4%, pregnancy-specific zone-MPC: 18.3 ± 12.0, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the time below range between the controllers (baseline zone-MPC: 0.5 ± 1.2%, pregnancy-specific zone-MPC: 3.5 ± 1.9%, p = 0.1). The extensive simulation results show improved performance in the pregnancy target range with pregnancy-specific zone MPC, suggest robustness of the zone-MPC in tight glucose control scenarios, and emphasize the need for customized glucose control systems for pregnancy.

Keywords: automated insulin delivery; in-silico verification; model predictive control; pregnancy; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FJD reports equity, licensed IP and is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Mode AGC. ED reports receiving grants from JDRF, NIH, and Helmsley Charitable Trust, personal fees from Roche and Eli Lilly, patents on artificial pancreas technology, and product support from Dexcom, Insulet, Tandem, and Roche. ED is currently an employee and shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company. The work presented in this manuscript was performed as part of his academic appointment and is independent of his employment with Eli Lilly and Company. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted. In the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with one of the authors BO within the past two years.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Block diagram describing the design and verification process of the zone-MPC controller for use in pregnancy. Closed-loop system is at the core (yellow shaded area). Scenario parameters (dashed lines) are fed into the simulator and the controller. The resulting glucose trajectories are evaluated for safety and performance. Controller parameters are tuned iteratively to obtain glucose outputs that satisfy the clinical requirements. Blue lines belong to the flow chart of this decision process. Note that the controller injects an optimal insulin input that minimizes the cost, J, at every time step.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sample insulin input, meal intake, and glucose trajectory for one subject under Scenario C.2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Fasting and two-hour postprandial glucose control performance.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atkinson MA, Eisenbarth GS, Michels AW. Type 1 Diabetes. Lancet (2014) 383:69–82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60591-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown SA, Kovatchev BP, Raghinaru D, Lum JW, Buckingham BA, Kudva YC, et al. . Six-Month Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med (2019) 381:1707–17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907863 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breton MD, Kanapka LG, Beck RW, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza GP, Cengiz E, et al. . A Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Children With Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med (2020) 383:836–45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004736 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnard KD, Wysocki T, Ully V, Mader JK, Pieber TR, Thabit H, et al. . Closing the Loop in Adults, Children and Adolescents With Suboptimally Controlled Type 1 Diabetes Under Free Living Conditions: A Psychosocial Substudy. J Diabetes Sci Technol (2017) 11:1080–8. doi: 10.1177/1932296817702656 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stewart ZA, Wilinska ME, Hartnell S, O’Neil LK, Rayman G, Scott EM, et al. . Day-And-Night Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in a Broad Population of Pregnant Women With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial. Diabetes Care (2018) 41:1391–9. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2534 - DOI - PubMed