Is it Safe to Save Levels and Choose the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra as Touched Vertebra While Selectively Fusing Lenke 1/2 Curves? A Proportional Meta-Analysis of Existing Evidence
- PMID: 35392687
- PMCID: PMC9837513
- DOI: 10.1177/21925682221091744
Is it Safe to Save Levels and Choose the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra as Touched Vertebra While Selectively Fusing Lenke 1/2 Curves? A Proportional Meta-Analysis of Existing Evidence
Abstract
Study design: Meta-analysis.
Objective: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with Adolescent Idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by selective thoracic fusion (STF) with lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at touched vertebra (TV) vs stable vertebra (SV).
Methods: The databases PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched until November 2020.Studies which had Lenke type 1 curves and Lenke type 2 curves in adolescent population treated by STF and which reported pre- and post-operative curve characteristics including correction percentage and complications were included. Studies which did not report the LIV selection, curve correction percentages and whose full text could not be acquired were excluded.
Results: Eight studies were included for analysis of which seven were found to be retrospective studies (level III evidence) and one was prospective study (level II evidence) each. Overall proportional meta-analysis found no significant difference in correction rate, total srs-22 scores, and complication rates.
Conclusion: The evaluation of SV group and TV group as LIV for selective thoracic fusions in AIS reveals a comparable outcome in terms of curve correction, patient satisfaction scores and complication rates. The TV can be chosen safely as the LIV especially in type A and B Lenke 1&2 curves, as it saves more motion segments when compared to SV.
Keywords: Lenke 1 & 2 curves; Selective thoracic fusion; Stable vertebra; Touched vertebra; adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
How to select the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients?Spine J. 2021 Jan;21(1):141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 15. Spine J. 2021. PMID: 32805433
-
Selection of the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra and Relative Odds Ratio of Distal Adding-on for Lenke Type 1A and 2A Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurospine. 2020 Dec;17(4):902-909. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040234.117. Epub 2020 Dec 31. Neurospine. 2020. PMID: 33401869 Free PMC article.
-
Selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: factors influencing the selection of the optimal lowest instrumented vertebra.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun 15;36(14):1131-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182053d19. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011. PMID: 21343851
-
Selective thoracic surgery in the Lenke type 1A: King III and King IV type curves.Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):82-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0990-0. Epub 2009 Apr 28. Eur Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19399532 Free PMC article.
-
Selective Thoracic Fusion for King-Moe Type II/Lenke 1C Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comprehensive Review of Major Concerns.Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018 Oct 10;3(2):113-125. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0047. eCollection 2019 Apr 27. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018. PMID: 31435563 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Selecting the Substantially Touched Vertebra as the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra in Spinal Surgeries for B3GALT6 -Related Disorders: Clinical Experience and Literature Review.Orthop Surg. 2025 Jul;17(7):2025-2037. doi: 10.1111/os.70072. Epub 2025 May 15. Orthop Surg. 2025. PMID: 40371684 Free PMC article.
-
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with concomitant spondylolysis: choice of fusion levels and evaluation of the outcomes obtained leaving the lytic level not instrumented.Spine Deform. 2023 Nov;11(6):1453-1460. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00715-9. Epub 2023 Jun 21. Spine Deform. 2023. PMID: 37341954 Free PMC article.
-
2D and 3D Classification Systems for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Clinical Implications and Technological Advances.Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr;17(4):999-1020. doi: 10.1111/os.14362. Epub 2025 Jan 18. Orthop Surg. 2025. PMID: 39825698 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Lenke LG, Betz RR, Clements D, et al. Curve prevalence of a new classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does classification correlate with treatment? Spine. 2002;27(6):604‐611. - PubMed
-
- Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Kamath G, Peelle MW, Bridwell KH. Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Spine. 2006;31(20):2400‐2404. - PubMed
-
- Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(8):1169‐1181. - PubMed
-
- Lehman RA, Lenke LG, Keeler KA, et al. Operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs: minimum three-year follow-up of one hundred fourteen cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(14):1598‐1604. - PubMed
-
- Sanchez-Raya J, Bago J. The effect of the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) on pain and quality of life in patients surgically treated for an idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2012;7(Suppl 1):P16. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources