Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;169(1):37-45.
doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-002000. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

Cognitive performance of military men and women during prolonged load carriage

Nicola C Armstrong  1   2 , S J R Smith  3 , D Risius  4 , D Doyle  4 , S L Wardle  5 , J P Greeves  5   6   7 , J R House  2 , M Tipton  2 , M Lomax  2
Affiliations

Cognitive performance of military men and women during prolonged load carriage

Nicola C Armstrong et al. BMJ Mil Health. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated cognitive workload in soldiers undertaking a long duration march wearing different loads.

Methods: Military participants (n=12 men and n=10 women) performed four 3-hour loaded marches (12.25 km at 4.9 km/hour) wearing either 21 kg, 26 kg, 33 kg or 43 kg. During the march, accuracy and response time were measured using the verbal working memory n-back test (0, 1, 2 and 3) and two bespoke Go/No Go tests (visual/auditory) to assess inhibition of a pre-potent response.

Results: The physical demands of the march increased with load and march duration but remained at moderate intensity. N-back test accuracy ranged from 74% to 98% in men and 62% to 98% in women. Reduced accuracy was observed as load and time increased. Accuracy during the visual Go/No Go test also reduced with load, accuracy ranged from 69% to 89% in men and 65% to 90% in women. No differences due to load or time were observed during completion of the auditory Go/No Go task; accuracy ranged from 93% to 97% in men and 77% to 95% in women. A number of participants were unable to complete the march due to discomfort. Reports of discomfort were more frequent in women, which may have contributed to the greater reductions in accuracy observed.

Conclusion: These data provide further evidence that cognitive performance of military personnel can be affected during long duration loaded marching. Women reported discomfort from equipment more frequently than men, which may make them more susceptible to declines in cognitive performance. These findings highlight important considerations for equipment procurement.

Keywords: education & training; physiology; sports medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Visual Go/No Go balcony scene and target locations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Friendly target (left), enemy target (centre), enemy target appearing at position 12 (right).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Accuracy measured during the n-backs. (A) 1-back, hour 1; (B) 2-back, hour 3; (C) 3-back, hour 1; (D) 3-back, hour 3. Dashed line represents mean data for women, complete line represents mean data for men. * indicates a difference from V-HIGH; Φ indicates a difference between the sexes (p<0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Left: visual Go/No Go accuracy measured during hour 1. Right: visual Go/No Go response time in LOW. Dashed line represents mean data for women, complete line represents mean data for men. * indicates a difference from LOW; † indicates a difference from hour 1; Φ indicates a difference between the sexes (p<0.05).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lloyd-Williams RC, Fordy G. The consequences of burden on the Dismounted soldier. (DSTL/CR68536/V1.0). Cited with permission from Dstl, 2013.
    1. Knapik JJ, Reynolds KL, Harman E. Soldier load carriage: historical, physiological, biomechanical, and medical aspects. Mil Med 2004;169:45–56. 10.7205/MILMED.169.1.45 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haisman MF. Determinants of load carrying ability. Appl Ergon 1988;19:111–21. 10.1016/0003-6870(88)90004-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Drain J, Billing D, Neesham-Smith D, et al. Predicting physiological capacity of human load carriage - a review. Appl Ergon 2016;52:85–94. 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bossi LLM, Tack DW, Karakolis T. Rationalizing the approach to mitigate soldier physical burden: are Ironman or Captain America our Magic Bullet? In: Belanger SAH, Breede HC, von Hlatky S, eds. Transhumanising war: performance implications for policy, society, and the soldier. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2020.